Regional Officer Amendment (August 2020)

[New Rogernomics]

I don't think we should set a number on regional officers, as in times of emergency we'd have to suspend the mandate to defend ourselves if we wanted more regional officers with border control, as we couldn't wait the required time to pass and discuss an amendment in such an emergency situation. 

The CLS should be exempt from this, as it ties it's hands unnecessarily. 

If the Assembly doesn't want someone as a member of the CLS, they already have a mechanism to remove someone through a vote. 

There is also never a circumstance where removing the Vice-Delegate from regional officer powers could ever be justified when they have done nothing wrong but meet some number limit.

If you want to make a limit for Cabinet, I could see an argument, but putting 12 as a limit on Cabinet and the CLS will create a mess if we ever need to temporarily boost the auditors.

I don't want the mandate to include something that could see us having to set it alight down the road, so I'd be against in its current form.

Edit: I'd also note that it would make the developer program difficult, if we have to IP/Proxy check residents.