Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Permanent Unalignment
#8
The proposal is unconstitutional; by dictating the majority by which it may be amended, it contradicts the mandate.

In addition to this, the proposal exchanges de facto neutrality for de jure neutrality. A law saying that the region is unaligned is no use if it offers no practical means to enforce that. As has been discussed before, the only such way to enforce neutrality is the measure that the amendment strikes out.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Permanent Unalignment - by Ryccia - 07-08-2020, 06:02 PM
RE: Permanent Unalignment - by Domais - 07-08-2020, 06:15 PM
RE: Permanent Unalignment - by Demonos - 07-08-2020, 07:53 PM
RE: Permanent Unalignment - by Debussy - 07-08-2020, 09:37 PM
RE: Permanent Unalignment - by Wymondham - 07-11-2020, 11:09 PM
RE: Permanent Unalignment - by joWhatup - 07-12-2020, 09:26 AM
RE: Permanent Unalignment - by Debussy - 07-12-2020, 06:48 PM
RE: Permanent Unalignment - by McChimp - 07-12-2020, 09:05 PM
RE: Permanent Unalignment - by Domais - 07-13-2020, 06:33 PM
RE: Permanent Unalignment - by Frankender - 09-02-2020, 01:40 PM
RE: Permanent Unalignment - by New Rogernomics - 09-02-2020, 02:06 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)