We should probably discuss whether we want full Directors to be allowed, as there could be conflicts of interest involved.
The more obvious hypothetical conflicts could include:
- Director of Shareholdership i.e. in charge of immigration
- Director of Public Relations i.e. foreign policy implications
- Director of the Regional Guard i.e. military policy
Less inclined to see any other Director role of issue though, as there isn't much that can be drawn into conflict if you are in charge of Internal Management for instance.
With the first, the potential conflict is that the same person admitting folks into Lazarus is running the assembly, and hypothetically someone could engage in what can be a technically legal, but widely disreputable, practice of vote importation, and use their knowledge and abilities as speaker to manipulate votes/elections by letting in folks they've imported at key moments.
With the second, the potential conflict is that the same person preparing Lazarene foreign policy is also running the assembly, and hypothetically they could speed up treaties they like, while frustrating ones they don't.
With the third, the potential conflict is that they are also running the military, and while this is the least likely given how the government is structured, hypothetically someone could use the position to encourage a change in R/D policy.