Legalist Zombal;6308 said:
So the delegate can appoint AND it can be done via "election determined by law"? So we also would need that election procedures to work for challenge elections.
The election procedures in an Elections Act we would pass, would determine that. This is a constitution amendment to allow for regional elections. Right now, an Elections Act would not be valid, as the Delegate only can direct for elections to ne held.
This would fix that, as I'll explain below.
Challenge Scenario:
1) X is bad at their job, and Y and Z challenge X to an election.
2) Elections Act defines for example that election campaigns run for one week, and elections for one week.
3) Z gets 50+1%
4) Delegate okay with Z, so Z is elected or Delegate doesn't like.
5) Elections Act defines that next highest candidate is selected or new election must be held.
6) Delegate appoints Y, as X lost challenge.
General Election (Managed):
1) Election held let's say every 3-4 months, as defined by Elections Act.
2) Elections Act defines for example that election campaigns run for one week, and elections for one week.
3) X, Y, and Z run.
4) Z wins if 50+1% or runoff election.
5) Delegate can reject or accept Z, Y, X.
General Election:
1) Election held let's say every 3-4 months, as defined by Elections Act.
2) Elections Act defines for example that election campaigns run for one week, and elections for one week.
3) X, Y, and Z run.
4) Z wins if 50+1% or runoff election.
5) Elections Act defines appointment as acceptance of results or a new election held.
Those are allowed, if the Elections Act defines it as such.