[Discussion] Assembly Procedure Act Amendment (October 2018)

[Amerion]

This amendment is intended to allow for crediting co-authors and others.

While my preference is to remove the credit section altogether, I understand that authorship may be an issue. If we are to stick to the present system of writing who authored what, I would like to see this expanded to crediting people who significantly aided in drafting the law, not only the original person who had the idea.

An issue I had in writing this was where to put the credit section. Should it go at the beginning or at the end?

Spoiler

Assembly Procedure Act Amendment (October 2018)

Proposed By: Amerion​

Preamble

This amendment of the Assembly Procedure Act makes allowance for crediting co-authors and others.

Section 1. Amendment of Section 4

(1) Subsection 1, as it is currently written, reads:

[align=left]

[/align]

(2) An amended subsection 1, with the inclusion of new text highlighted in green, shall read:

[/align]

(3) After subsection 4, insert:

[/align]

---

[/align]

---

 

[Cormac]

I'm fine with this.

 

[TempestShadow]

Looks pretty good to me

 

[McChimp]

Yep, looks good.

 

[Arlo]

Seems to be the Speaker's reasoning was that the author in a bill provided clear authority for who controlled that bill -- but surely we can just say that the thread OP is the one who has that authority? I don't think we need an author section in the bill at all.

 

[Amerion]

As it stands, the authorship section shall remain in place.

The issue of authorship and whether it should be mentioned in an Act is not the topic of this amendment. Perhaps, in another amendment.

This amendment seeks to make the best of the current situation and afford recognition for those who have significantly aided in the drafting of a bill.

With that being said, I would like to motion a vote.

 

[Cormac]

Seconded.

 

[McChimp]

A vote has been opened here: https://nslazarus.com/showthread.php?tid=343

Voting will end on Sunday the 7th of October at 14:47 p.m. EDT.