My opinion on the war on NPO is well-documented ("dumb" is the key adjective here), so an Armistice as a starting point sounds good to me in principle, BUT I assume NPO wouldn't even agree to that, precisely because it's so meaningless, and them agreeing to an armistice would be them actually acknowledging any remote threat that just doesn't even exist. So they'll probably counter offer with a NAP as a "take it or leave it" option.
Armistice = cessation of hostilities. There have been no hostilities, only Lazarus bending over backward and frowning at people to save face. Why not just end it already?
Regarding TWP, it's not that unusual in FA circles to not tell ally X about a possible alliance with region Y, though in some cases a bit of sensibility and a heads up is appropriate. Given the war (dumb or not), this is one of those cases. I think the way to handle this is to talk to TWP, frown at them, and let it slide otherwise.
Armistice = cessation of hostilities. There have been no hostilities, only Lazarus bending over backward and frowning at people to save face. Why not just end it already?
Regarding TWP, it's not that unusual in FA circles to not tell ally X about a possible alliance with region Y, though in some cases a bit of sensibility and a heads up is appropriate. Given the war (dumb or not), this is one of those cases. I think the way to handle this is to talk to TWP, frown at them, and let it slide otherwise.