Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[Amendment] Section II Security Amendment
#2
I don't, "coup" is too subjective. Sometimes couping a region is what is best for the region, now I would support the CLS making a list of people who can't become delegate for various reasons, but, I don't think being a couper should automatically disqualify someone. I think it should be up to the CLS and whether they think it should disqualify someone, on a case by case biases.

Edit: As it stands the Delegate has to be confirmed by either the CLS or the Assembly, so why not defer this to them?


Messages In This Thread
RE: [Amendment] Section II Security Amendment - by Domais - 05-06-2020, 07:19 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)