Lazarene Treaty Clarification Law

[New Rogernomics]

Unfortunately, this is unconstitutional, as it clearly states in the mandate that constitutional laws and resolutions may be amended by a three quarters vote:

(10) The Assembly may enact constitutional laws and resolutions, bearing the same legal weight as this Mandate, and may amend or repeal such constitutional laws and resolutions, by three-quarters vote. Constitutional laws and resolutions must be explicitly designated as such within the text of each constitutional law or resolution, and may not either explicitly or implicitly amend or repeal this Mandate or other constitutional laws or resolutions.

So the language should use the terminology 'general laws and resolutions', otherwise it would require an amendment to the mandate.

Alternatively, it must use a three-quarters vote terminology.

So:

a. If contradictions may be found between treaties ratified by the Assembly and legislation passed by the Assembly, the Assembly shall by three-quarters vote be enabled to pass resolutions to rectify such contradictions.