02-23-2020, 01:41 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-23-2020, 01:54 AM by New Rogernomics.)
Debussy;8450 Wrote:In Section 2. subsection (2) there should be a way to request the delegate for information in cases that don't pertain to anything outlined.
Can we get a designated forum written into the law instead of different forum topics that will need to be found all over the forum?
Why does the court decide appeals? How many appeals can happen before a panel of 3?
Putting a designated forum in the act would be unconstitutional i.e. compelling creation of a sub forum by admins, and a bit unnecessary as admins don't need an act to create a sub forum nor has there been a case where a request to do so was outright refused.
As for the Delegate by the Mandate they can't be compelled to state why they refused someone citizenship or appointed someone to the CLS beyond the official reason they provided. It would be a bit of a redundant request, as the reason is stated in the appointment post or in case of citizenship in the citizenship thread.
The court would cover appeals, as they are allowed to interpret laws, and decide legal matters. It would have to be on a case by case basis how many appeals are granted as well, which the court can decide.