[Proposal] Charter of the Lazarene Regional Guard Amendment

[New Rogernomics]

Tubbiuz haz like zero military experience... and I think not a vhole lot of interezt in learning hov to plan operationz for a military (correct me if im miztaken tubbiuz), zo I think giving the direction of operationz to him primarily izn't a vay to make the guard more active. The commander of an army iz generally the perzon vho givez direction to it, and I think that'z a good vay for it to vork. They are put in the pozition becauze they are good and truzted in vhat they do, and don't need to be judged az trying to align or not align the region every op they take on (altho i might be a lil biazed atm for thiz!)

Well generally, the commander-and-chief doesn't require military experience, as they are meant to be given advice by the operational commander, and they rely on the Regional Guard to give them an honest and fair assessment, as without that trust the whole relationship falls apart. So if the operational commander is allowed to be biased, then it is reasonable to follow that the commander-and-chief will then get poor advice and not necessarily make the right decision. 

So with this amendment, the feasibility is to be around not whether the operational commander can say that they favor "raiding" or "defending", and instead about the operational commander establishing the Regional Guard publicly as a raider or defender organization, and only organizing raids or defenses, and defying the part of the existing act that expresses a neutral alignment of the Regional Guard.

Ultimately however, even without military experience the commander-and-chief can understand when their operational commander is upsetting the region, causing strife with friendly or allied regions, and disrupting the neutral alignment, and for those situations you'd either want the operational commander to be prevented from doing any of that in the first place or to remove them outright. 

If you don't make clear in the Regional Guard Charter however that such actions are not permitted, then it will appear an unfair action or dismissal, as the Delegate would be sanctioning them for something they had never been clearly excluded from doing.