I don't think leaving approval at the Delegate's discretion is a good solution. It sidesteps rigorously defining exactly what kinds of operations would and would not be permitted, leading to the kind of vagueness Imaginary has pointed out-how are we supposed to know whether an operation is an act of war or not? That clause in particular seems unsuitable for law. It also leaves the alignment of the guard at the discretion of the operational commander, since they could only organise raids or only organise defences. This doesn't resolve the alignment issue, it just doesn't discuss it.
The idea that the Assembly could veto those decisions is incorrect-this law contains no such provision and neither does any other.
The idea that the Assembly could veto those decisions is incorrect-this law contains no such provision and neither does any other.