10-23-2019, 09:02 PM
They are not sound. In fact, motioning to vote because of your confidence in certain arguments is the exact definition of not being impartial. If you do not understand that, it only reinforces the need for elections, or renewed confirmations. Security risks should be checked at the door, and be the responsibility of the council of security and delegate. This security arguement of yours, if you really believe it, should be incentive to stop all these reforms all together. Why elect anyone when there could be a risk?