09-20-2019, 07:24 PM
Imaginary Friend:
The Guard would lose a competent updater, though my thoughts on Laz having the Guard in the first place are known. That being said, your dedication to Lazarus doesn't need to be debated, so this is quite a natural choice. How do you feel about being WA-locked?
Galiantus:
You have a penchant for having odd and often unworkable ideas to do one thing or another, sometimes to the point of rote stubborness. As far as I'm aware you don't have experience in GCR security, so you'd have to learn the ropes from the rest of the CLS. My worry here is that if that stubborness persists in the face of others on the CLS that do know their stuff wrt GCR security (particularly KK, for better or worse
). I don't have an outright question for you, though it'd be nice if you could drop a few lines to help assuage my concerns.
Loftegen:
Your longevity within Lazarus across governments and your tenure as HRL Delegate as well as HRL and CU Guardian makes you inherently the most trusted of the three candidates presented here. During Kowassati's Delegacy, The Black Hawks at one point decided to attack Lazarus by propping you into the Delegacy for 12 hours. You held the seat and didn't coup, as you were supposed to. You also had a bit of fun by temporarily retheming the region a bit to mock the situation, which was also fine (even if some disagreed with the Kekistan theme). What was problematic, however, were some of the things regarding endorsements you placed on the WFE, and some of your Regional Officer dismissals (particularly wrt Border Control, which cannot be immediately reappointed by a fresh Delegate). While I have no doubt that these were not malicious acts, they were obviously problematic and led to you being recalled from Guardianship soon after. It's very possible that a CLS member may be the temporary in-game Delegate for a while again, be it through another act of aggression as the Black Hawks committed in 2017, or for the purposes of transitioning, or due to recalls, resignations, etc. of the Delegate, or any number of other reasons. Please assure us that you are now cognizant of the restrictions of Border Control appointments in such a situation and would exercise a bit more care should such a situation arise again.
The Guard would lose a competent updater, though my thoughts on Laz having the Guard in the first place are known. That being said, your dedication to Lazarus doesn't need to be debated, so this is quite a natural choice. How do you feel about being WA-locked?
Galiantus:
You have a penchant for having odd and often unworkable ideas to do one thing or another, sometimes to the point of rote stubborness. As far as I'm aware you don't have experience in GCR security, so you'd have to learn the ropes from the rest of the CLS. My worry here is that if that stubborness persists in the face of others on the CLS that do know their stuff wrt GCR security (particularly KK, for better or worse
). I don't have an outright question for you, though it'd be nice if you could drop a few lines to help assuage my concerns.Loftegen:
Your longevity within Lazarus across governments and your tenure as HRL Delegate as well as HRL and CU Guardian makes you inherently the most trusted of the three candidates presented here. During Kowassati's Delegacy, The Black Hawks at one point decided to attack Lazarus by propping you into the Delegacy for 12 hours. You held the seat and didn't coup, as you were supposed to. You also had a bit of fun by temporarily retheming the region a bit to mock the situation, which was also fine (even if some disagreed with the Kekistan theme). What was problematic, however, were some of the things regarding endorsements you placed on the WFE, and some of your Regional Officer dismissals (particularly wrt Border Control, which cannot be immediately reappointed by a fresh Delegate). While I have no doubt that these were not malicious acts, they were obviously problematic and led to you being recalled from Guardianship soon after. It's very possible that a CLS member may be the temporary in-game Delegate for a while again, be it through another act of aggression as the Black Hawks committed in 2017, or for the purposes of transitioning, or due to recalls, resignations, etc. of the Delegate, or any number of other reasons. Please assure us that you are now cognizant of the restrictions of Border Control appointments in such a situation and would exercise a bit more care should such a situation arise again.