07-19-2019, 06:54 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-19-2019, 06:55 PM by New Rogernomics.)
It is not my place to comment on individual Council of Lazarene Security nominations, so I will not be doing that, but I will comment on the general requirements and optional requirements that would be good for the CLS in general and those that wish to join it.
Firstly, the CLS always needs to have balance, meaning it shouldn't be lopsided to any faction, or have an issue with citizen loyalty.
Here are a few CLS hypothetical scenarios, where the CLS has:
1) Two members of faction x, and two members of faction y, and is going to add another member.
2) One candidate that has loyalty to a hostile region.
3) One candidate that has multiple citizenship and is mostly inactive in Lazarus.
4) One candidate that threatens to coup the region often.
In example 1, the best policy is to want a neutral member or a member of the opposite faction/affiliation, as this would prevent one faction having total dominance over the CLS. That said, there would be exceptions to this i.e. such as if someone leans faction x/faction y, but isn't a member of them.
In example 2, it would have to be denied outright as a best policy. It would be inappropriate to have a member of the NPO as a member of the CLS.
In example 3, you wouldn't want an inactive candidate that isn't up to doing their duties. In the case of the CLS it would mean someone with few endorsements, and someone who isn't around the discord or the forum at least once a week.
In example 4, it would certainly work against a candidate, and it would have to be reviewed carefully - even if it is just a joke.
As for the optional, but useful requirements that could really act in favor of a candidate:
1) Has high regional influence already i.e. so in the case of Lazarus at least 100 endorsements.
2) Has some general knowledge of update times.
3) Has participated in military/organization operations in the past.
4) Has expressed loyalty to the region in some major way.
5) Understands the constitutional procedure, and would be active enough to vote as required on the CLS.
6) Has no favoritism. Meaning if someone is to be ejected that they like or hate, they won't let that influence their vote.
Firstly, the CLS always needs to have balance, meaning it shouldn't be lopsided to any faction, or have an issue with citizen loyalty.
Here are a few CLS hypothetical scenarios, where the CLS has:
1) Two members of faction x, and two members of faction y, and is going to add another member.
2) One candidate that has loyalty to a hostile region.
3) One candidate that has multiple citizenship and is mostly inactive in Lazarus.
4) One candidate that threatens to coup the region often.
In example 1, the best policy is to want a neutral member or a member of the opposite faction/affiliation, as this would prevent one faction having total dominance over the CLS. That said, there would be exceptions to this i.e. such as if someone leans faction x/faction y, but isn't a member of them.
In example 2, it would have to be denied outright as a best policy. It would be inappropriate to have a member of the NPO as a member of the CLS.
In example 3, you wouldn't want an inactive candidate that isn't up to doing their duties. In the case of the CLS it would mean someone with few endorsements, and someone who isn't around the discord or the forum at least once a week.
In example 4, it would certainly work against a candidate, and it would have to be reviewed carefully - even if it is just a joke.
As for the optional, but useful requirements that could really act in favor of a candidate:
1) Has high regional influence already i.e. so in the case of Lazarus at least 100 endorsements.
2) Has some general knowledge of update times.
3) Has participated in military/organization operations in the past.
4) Has expressed loyalty to the region in some major way.
5) Understands the constitutional procedure, and would be active enough to vote as required on the CLS.
6) Has no favoritism. Meaning if someone is to be ejected that they like or hate, they won't let that influence their vote.