New Rogernomics;4723 Wrote:The problem with this section is that a law can accidently breach the mandate. Adding willfully would account for that.
The wording you have taken issue with has already passed into law. It's not an issue, though, because as it stands it says that it has to have been done "with the intention of illegally removing or altering the Mandate, the Government or the Delegate." Although the wording is different, "with the intention of" means as much as "willfully".