10-12-2018, 12:47 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-12-2018, 12:47 AM by Mysterious Player.)
McChimp;4200 Wrote:OK, I've fixed a drafting error I made last night. In terms of feedback:
Mysterious Player;4196 Wrote:The problem with this is that the applicant can simply list no identities, and just claim that they didn't realize it was noteworthy. I guess it would only work to a point, but still. I would rather require all identities in a certain time frame be required to list than ones that are considered noteworthy by the applicant.
The crime in question would be fraud. The applicant would be lying if they said that a non-exhaustive list of their notable identities was exhaustive. The way that law is defined, it is necessary to convince the Justices that it was done knowingly. I can only see this being taken to court if somebody omitted a really obviously notable identity, say if Onder came here under an assumed name and just happened to "forget" to mention that he was Onder. In consequential cases like that I believe that it is beyond reasonable doubt for the Justices to accept that the accused just "forgot" so it should be fine as it is.
The problem is that a "notable" identity is subjective. Although, i think it would be fine if the Delegate had authority on what constitutes a "notable" identity.
Quote:I think in the thread for Amerion's citizenship act there were concerns about how other regions may have found players guilty with show trials. I think that it's not unreasonable to believe that our and our allies' courts are fair but the same cannot necessarily be said about the rest of NS.
If the Delegate thinks that a player was found guilty through a show trial, then they should just ignore it. The Delegate wouldn't be required to deny somebody citizen due to committing a crime in another region.