Arlo;3777 Wrote:Can I say I dislike oaths. They are entirely useless.
I see your point. However, they are present in almost all the regions I am familiar with. I am open to removing it if others feel very strongly about it.
New Rogernomics;3780 Wrote:There is an alternative to either option, which is to remove citizenship masks, but not citizenship. If X person goes inactive for 6 months for example, then that account becomes a 'Resident' mask account. However, if they return and post a certain amount, it is automatically re-instated as a Citizenship account after one hour. This is possible through the Group Promotion system, which maintains a full promotion log, without anyone having to put their time into doing anything, as it happens automatically.
This would go a long way to addressing one of Cormac's concerns about how '... an activity requirement will do is burden the person who has to track compliance with the requirement.'
At present, Section 2(1) stipulates a calender-month, but that can be amended to once-a-select-number-of-days. I will see how the poll goes before making a determination on the exact wording.
[Edit]
For the record, three polls have been created to gauge how people feel about certain aspects found in this bill.
Poll 1 — https://nslazarus.com/showthread.php?tid=319
Poll 2 — https://nslazarus.com/showthread.php?tid=318
Poll 3 — https://nslazarus.com/showthread.php?tid=317