Under "Vexatious proceedings", who determines what is "reasonable ground"? Reason is entirely subjective. For a Christian, for example, God came as a man and forgave our sins, whilst I do not believe in that. For a Wolfist, La Resistance was the one planning a coup, not Funk. Others might disagree. And a corrupt judge can just claim "Vexatious proceedings" to refuse or close a case. Thus, I propose something like this:
If my advice is taken, I do suggest better wording, as I recognize that my writing skills might be poor in your eyes. And if I have misrepresented or missed anything, do tell.
Also, can we add crimes like "electoral manipulation" or "corruption", perhaps?
Quote:...
a. instigates or pursues judicial proceedings without reasonable ground more than twice, under which the same case has already been ruled upon twice;
If my advice is taken, I do suggest better wording, as I recognize that my writing skills might be poor in your eyes. And if I have misrepresented or missed anything, do tell.
Also, can we add crimes like "electoral manipulation" or "corruption", perhaps?