08-29-2018, 01:28 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-29-2018, 01:43 PM by New Rogernomics.)
Quote:(5) The Delegate may refuse to approve an application if the applicant has:
a. not met the criteria for eligibility;
i. the Delegate may, at their discretion, issue a waiver in instances where the applicant has not met the criteria;
a. not satisfactorily completed the citizenship application;
b. has violated community standards through their out of character activities;*
c. been rendered an adverse security threat by the Delegate or the Council of Lazarene Security; or
d. engaged in conduct with the intention of attaining multiple accounts.
*It will need something like that.
This is due to the fact that as written, we would have no grounds to deny citizenship to sexual harassers, COPS violators, or even someone like Llamas.
Ex-Post-Facto would prevent this law changing existing rulings on citizenship, but it wouldn't prevent an appeal by this law.
So technically person x could wait till this is passed, and apply again, as community standards was applied to effectively keep them out. There was no formal trial to establish criminal guilt.
If this passes (as written), I'd have to request a formal trial for Llamas, Kon, Ark, and really anyone else we've kept out on basis of community standards/treason. We could avoid that whole procedural mess by putting in something like I've bolded above.