Constie;2899 Wrote:I think Conspiracy should be moved up to tier two
I had thought of that but it occurred to me that if Conspiracy was to be made a Tier 2 offence then Conspiracy to commit a Tier 3 offence would warrant a punishment greater than one mandated by the offence itself - which is illogical.
Roavin;2900 Wrote:Espionage: the punishment should take into account the offender's intent.
Foreign interference: This should only be an offense if there was intent. Otherwise it's way too easy to abuse.
Defamation: Okay, this one must be changed. Let's take Constie. I have absolutely no issue with Constie (and indeed, when I coup Balder in 2021, he will succeed me as Delegate). That being said - Constie has done stuff in-game I don't agree with. Now suppose Imki is considering appointing Constie to do FA, and I disagree that Constie is the right person for the job. I would then write Imki and say "hey, I don't think Constie is a good idea, consider thing X Y Z he did in the CU". This would already trigger the defamation rule. I'm expressing an opinion and a verifiable truth, but that would already be intent of "harm", because I wrote Imki with the intent of her considering somebody else for FA than Constie. Bam, I'm guilty. Obviously, that's absurd.
And generally (though less importantly), I don't particularly like the layout of the law. Let me sleep on it for a day for a layout that (in my personal opinion) is better.
Nods
I'll wait for your proposed layout.
In the meantime, I'll tighten up the language used.