05-29-2021, 03:13 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-29-2021, 03:22 AM by New Rogernomics.)
Since the discussion has started on this, these are some major threads of reference related to when war was declared and the aftermath:
As for my opinion:
Firstly, I have no objection to ending the war, as continuing it seems pointless given the NPO has shown no interest in undermining Lazarus, and has made efforts to show goodwill.
Secondly, if we do end the war, given that we are implying by that act that no hostilities exist between our two regions, I would doubt that the APC treaty would exist perpetually though it seems for now most would be resistant to repealing it.
Thirdly, if and when the APC treaty is repealed, restoration of diplomatic relations would be in order with the New Pacific Order, even if embassies are not re-established.
Lastly, if we decide to end the proscription, separately from the APC treaty issue, it is reasonable to assume that Aleisyr, Pergamon, Svezjacael, Stujenske, and Feux, will likely be barred from the region by CLS vote*, though other NPO citizens can be accepted/rejected on a case by basis via normal citizenship procedures.
*The option for the CLS to revisit this would still exist, though probably best to be safe for now and discuss status of difficult nations later.
Note: I'll need time to give a more detailed response to 3, though I'd argue a Non-Aggression-Pact would be the agreement to sign with the NPO. Though the APC treaty might complicate that, and if it does a repeal of that treaty would have to occur first.
- Proscription of the NPO discussion
- War with the NPO discussion
- Statement and Apology from the NPO (and discussion)
- Statement on the NPO (and discussion)
As for my opinion:
Firstly, I have no objection to ending the war, as continuing it seems pointless given the NPO has shown no interest in undermining Lazarus, and has made efforts to show goodwill.
Secondly, if we do end the war, given that we are implying by that act that no hostilities exist between our two regions, I would doubt that the APC treaty would exist perpetually though it seems for now most would be resistant to repealing it.
Thirdly, if and when the APC treaty is repealed, restoration of diplomatic relations would be in order with the New Pacific Order, even if embassies are not re-established.
Lastly, if we decide to end the proscription, separately from the APC treaty issue, it is reasonable to assume that Aleisyr, Pergamon, Svezjacael, Stujenske, and Feux, will likely be barred from the region by CLS vote*, though other NPO citizens can be accepted/rejected on a case by basis via normal citizenship procedures.
*The option for the CLS to revisit this would still exist, though probably best to be safe for now and discuss status of difficult nations later.
Note: I'll need time to give a more detailed response to 3, though I'd argue a Non-Aggression-Pact would be the agreement to sign with the NPO. Though the APC treaty might complicate that, and if it does a repeal of that treaty would have to occur first.