11-11-2020, 08:49 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-11-2020, 08:50 PM by Frankender.)
Domais;11176 Wrote:A. That would be unconstitutional B. It is their prerogative whether or not they wish to post in these threads. Leo doesn't seem to ever contribute to the discussion and there is no reason why he should have to if he doesn't want to.
Not sure the logic in arguing with the only person defending your bill! Since you're interested in an argument for the sheer sake of it . . .
No, it is not unconstitutional. You are referring to this section on the mandate:
(12) In the absence of procedural rules to settle a procedural matter in the Assembly, the Assembly Speaker may establish such rules. Procedural rules established by the Assembly Speaker will always be subordinate to the laws of Lazarus and procedural rules established by the Assembly.
The constitution does not dictate any procedural rules.
Perhaps you are referring to the Assembly Procedure Act?
(5) All votes will take place for five days. Citizens eligible to vote may vote "Aye," "Nay," or "Abstain." Voters may not post any other content in a voting thread or embellish the format of their vote in any way, and votes that include additional content or embellishment will be discarded and split from the voting thread. Voters may cast their votes by posting in each voting thread.
My deliberate protest of this rule within the Assembly Procedure Act was not an unconstitutional one.