09-14-2020, 07:07 PM
I don't have anything to add except what was already eloquently said. Also against.
But I do have to address this one thing:
This is a bad faith argument. What McChimp and others are saying is that there is a different route to deal with it. You're portraying it as them being fine with hate speech. That's frankly disgusting - this isn't a conversation about the nations within the lore of NationStates gameplay, this is a conversation about players participating in the game, on a meta level. Those are the areas of offsite administration and/or NS moderators, not a part of the lore of the game.
But I do have to address this one thing:
Demonos;10722 Wrote:So let me get this strait, you are against an overt law that recognizes hate speech?
This is a bad faith argument. What McChimp and others are saying is that there is a different route to deal with it. You're portraying it as them being fine with hate speech. That's frankly disgusting - this isn't a conversation about the nations within the lore of NationStates gameplay, this is a conversation about players participating in the game, on a meta level. Those are the areas of offsite administration and/or NS moderators, not a part of the lore of the game.