Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[Discussion] Voting Expansion Act (September 2018)
#11
Amerion;3832 Wrote:Hmm. I'm indifferent to it
As am I. The entire idea was to have a legislature that is... more indifferent to how (at least insofar as styling goes) we vote?
#12
Vulturret;3833 Wrote:
Amerion;3832 Wrote:Hmm. I'm indifferent to it
As am I. The entire idea was to have a legislature that is... more indifferent to how (at least insofar as styling goes) we vote? 

Ahhh. I'm confused by the last part of that sentence.
#13
OK, I suppose I ought to clarify given what you've said: this proposal will be treated as a competitor if both come to vote. If you choose to collaborate, that is obviously equally valid and whatever eventually comes to vote will be treated as any act usually would.
#14
Amerion;3834 Wrote:
Vulturret;3833 Wrote:
Amerion;3832 Wrote:Hmm. I'm indifferent to it
As am I. The entire idea was to have a legislature that is... more indifferent to how (at least insofar as styling goes) we vote? 

Ahhh. I'm confused by the last part of that sentence.
Basically the point of the proposal is to make the Speaker not care how you chose to vote as much as currently.

McChimp;3838 Wrote:OK, I suppose I ought to clarify given what you've said: this proposal will be treated as a competitor if both come to vote. If you choose to collaborate, that is obviously equally valid and whatever eventually comes to vote will be treated as any act usually would.
Thank you for your transparency and clarification.
#15
Thanks for the clarification
#16
Amerion;3858 Wrote:Thanks for the clarification
No problem.
#17
[delted]
#18
In accordance with Section 2 (1) of the Assembly Procedure Act (August 2018), this proposal may now be motioned to given that has been on the floor for three days. Given this, I will now motion to vote. Do I have a second?
#19
I'll second
#20
Mysterious Player;3899 Wrote:I'll second
Thank you!


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)