Posts: 574
Threads: 39
Joined: Jun 2018
Reputation:
0
I see your point. Although I respectfully disagree with it, as there is no significant issue with providing Legislators with options as to how they cast their votes.
I also do not consider this bill as providing the Speaker with a wide authority on interpreting a vote. '[An] appropriate synonym' is pretty unambiguous and would only require a cursory glance at a thesaurus should any dispute of the vote arise.
Posts: 191
Threads: 24
Joined: Jul 2018
Reputation:
0
09-22-2018, 08:11 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-22-2018, 08:15 AM by Cormac.)
I don't like "appropriate synonym." Too much ambiguity and Speaker discretion, leading to complaints and potential legal challenges. Is "YOLO" an appropriate synonym for Aye, or not? I would argue it could be. Some would probably argue it couldn't. You see the issue. You might think the issue is absurd, and I'd agree with you, but if there's anything I've learned in NS it's that you can't discount the possibility of a completely absurd and unlikely outcome happening and causing the maximum amount of possible drama. People get bored and do ridiculous things. I've found that low-level, light "trolling" (can't think of a better word for it) is pretty commonplace.
I should note in the interest of full disclosure: I'm not above casting a vote of "YOLO" if this passes, just to test my theory. So I guess pencil me in as one of the low-level, light "trolling" people. :lol:
Why not just allow votes of Aye or For, Nay or Against, Abstain or Present? If someone can't find one of those options suitable, they're just trying to be annoying to be honest. 
Cormac Skollvaldr
"We are all misfits living in a world on fire." - Kelly Clarkson, "People Like Us"
Posts: 574
Threads: 39
Joined: Jun 2018
Reputation:
0
Cormac;3624 Wrote:...
Why not just allow votes of Aye or For, Nay or Against, Abstain or Present? If someone can't find one of those options suitable, they're just trying to be annoying to be honest.
I think amending it to allow for 'Present' is a great idea.
Posts: 162
Threads: 3
Joined: Aug 2018
Cormac definitely is going with the same kind of logic I had. I would certainly much rather expand the voting options allowed by the Assembly Procedure Act than give the Speaker the wide-ranging discretion that the current proposal would afford.
Posts: 454
Threads: 79
Joined: Jul 2018
Personally I think that there's absolutely nothing wrong with "nay". I for one like how archaic it is.
Posts: 393
Threads: 11
Joined: Jun 2018
Reputation:
0
09-22-2018, 11:58 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-23-2018, 12:00 AM by Ryccia.)
Determining what is an "appropriate synonym" is in itself a subjective affair. I must concur with Cormac, it might be a triviality, but when is NSGP not dramatic and prone to tear its head apart?
Laws require objective, specific and precise definitions. I'd argue that this subjective amendment would only create ambiguities, as demonstrated by Cormac. And we cannot have it. For one of the issues toxicity finds substinence is ambiguity, which leads to confusion, and, in the end, might lead to confrontation.
And allowing the Speaker to edit a vote? I certainly wish that to not be the case. Whilst we can object in the circumstances that a Speaker is to be corrupt and change a citizen's choice at the last second, we should not have to object in the first place. That demonstrates poor lawmaking, a poor fabric to sew Lazarene law, and, as an effect, an united and harmonious Lazarus.
An expansion of the availabilities of how to say a vote, as suggested by other members of this chamber, is more optimal. Like so...
Quote:(5) All votes will take place for five days. Citizens eligible to vote may vote "Aye", "Approve", "Yes", "Acceptable", "Affirmative", "In Favour", or "For" to vote in the affirmative; "Nay," "Disapprove", "No", "Unacceptable", or "Against" to vote against; and "Abstain" or "Present" to abstain. Voters may not post any other content in a voting thread or embellish the format of their vote in any way, and votes that include additional content or embellishment will be discarded and split from the voting thread. Voters may cast their votes by posting in each voting thread.
Posts: 71
Threads: 2
Joined: Jun 2018
Reputation:
0
As someone who works with law every day, honestly our laws are often not at all specific or precise.  But that's also why we have so many court cases so it's not exactly something we want to replicate.
Quote:Why not just allow votes of Aye or For, Nay or Against, Abstain or Present?
This is reasonable to me. I don't think we need to make an exhaustive list, just allow for something slightly more modern than "Nay". "For" and "Against" are much clearer and straightforward words than "Aye" and "Nay" anyway -- modern simple language is always preferable in law to archaic words or legalese.
Posts: 574
Threads: 39
Joined: Jun 2018
Reputation:
0
09-23-2018, 09:47 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-23-2018, 09:51 AM by Amerion.)
[spoiler=Exhaustive list]
Assembly Procedure Act Amendment (September 2018)
Proposed By: Arlo
Preamble
This amendment of the Assembly Procedure Act makes allowance for appropriate synonyms of voting declarations.
Section 1. Amendment of Section 2
(1) Subsection 5, as it is currently written, reads:
[table][cell]
(5) All votes will take place for five days. Citizens eligible to vote may vote "Aye," "Nay," or "Abstain." Voters may not post any other content in a voting thread or embellish the format of their vote in any way, and votes that include additional content or embellishment will be discarded and split from the voting thread. Voters may cast their votes by posting in each voting thread.
[/cell][/table]
(2) An amended subsection 5, with the inclusion of new text highlighted in green, shall read:
[table][cell]
(5) All votes will take place for five days. Citizens eligible to vote may vote "Aye", "Approve", "Yes", "Acceptable", "Affirmative", "In Favour", or "For" to vote in the affirmative; "Nay," "Disapprove", "No", "Unacceptable", or "Against" to vote against; and "Abstain" or "Present" to abstain. Voters may not post any other content in a voting thread or embellish the format of their vote in any way, and votes that include additional content or embellishment will be discarded and split from the voting thread. Voters may cast their votes by posting in each voting thread.
[/cell][/table]
[/spoiler]
[spoiler=Simplified list]
Assembly Procedure Act Amendment (September 2018)
Proposed By: Arlo
Preamble
This amendment of the Assembly Procedure Act makes allowance for appropriate synonyms of voting declarations.
Section 1. Amendment of Section 2
(1) Subsection 5, as it is currently written, reads:
[table][cell]
(5) All votes will take place for five days. Citizens eligible to vote may vote "Aye," "Nay," or "Abstain." Voters may not post any other content in a voting thread or embellish the format of their vote in any way, and votes that include additional content or embellishment will be discarded and split from the voting thread. Voters may cast their votes by posting in each voting thread.
[/cell][/table]
(2) An amended subsection 5, with the inclusion of new text highlighted in green, shall read:
[table][cell]
(5) All votes will take place for five days. Citizens eligible to vote may vote "Aye" or "For" to vote in the affirmative; "Nay" or "Against" to vote in the negative; and "Abstain" or "Present" to indicate abstention. Voters may not post any other content in a voting thread or embellish the format of their vote in any way, and votes that include additional content or embellishment will be discarded and split from the voting thread. Voters may cast their votes by posting in each voting thread.
[/cell][/table]
[/spoiler]
Posts: 574
Threads: 39
Joined: Jun 2018
Reputation:
0
Pick your favourite candy kids
Posts: 39
Threads: 2
Joined: Jul 2018
Reputation:
0
09-23-2018, 01:22 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-23-2018, 01:24 PM by Sheepshape.)
I think this is getting silly.
I have first hand experience with how these things get out of hand, and you can see it starting to happen right now. If you allow something like "synonyms", you're going to get people voting in other languages, some of which the Speaker may understand and some of which they may not, but which can lead to discrimination in which get counted and which get discounted. You're going to get people posting in emojis, then arguing over whether  illy: is obviously a vote for (it's smiling!) or obviously a vote against (an upside-down smile is a frown!). You're going to get people posting GIFs, then others complaining that when those links are inevitably lost we won't have a record of how that person voted.
As for trying to create an exhaustive list? Well, that has its own dangers. Suppose we use Amerion's draft:
Quote:"Aye", "Approve", "Yes", "Acceptable", "Affirmative", "In Favour", or "For" to vote in the affirmative
Well, now you're gonna get arguments. If all those, why not "sure"? Why not "yeah"? Why not "okay" or "super" or "excellent" or "heck yeah" or "goodness yes" or "your ideas intrigue me and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter" or "shut up and take my money!"? Why not "ja", I mean, we all know that one after all, it's not like it's crazy arabic. But for that matter, why not crazy arabic, since if we're making a firm list we can just put the romanization *and* the arabic letters in there and it's fine. And why not elvish and klingon while we're at it? And maybe we could also include emojis in the list?  and  are pretty straightforward after all, everyone knows what those mean.
I'm being humerous but I'm not actually kidding. These are all things I have personally seen happen when a speaker of an assembly tries to open things up to some flexibility. People love to push the boundaries of what's allowed and what isn't, and I can't even say that I myself am above doing that. Sometimes we all have a rebellious FU to authority that's trying to get out.
Pick ONE thing. Yes/No/Pass, Aye/Nay/Abstain, For/Against/Present. Not all three. Not two. ONE thing. It is not onerous or an impediment to someone's right to vote to require that they use that one thing to cast their vote, without embellishment. It is the simplest and best solution that avoids any messy kerfuffles over exactly what is allowed.
I have no strong preferences between the options; any would be fine. But... only one.
|
