Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[Discussion] Speaker Appointment
#11
McChimp;3511 Wrote:1: Probably not. I'm a student and can't really afford to spend money on things like stamps so it would have to be done manually. This would take an exorbitant amount of time. One of the reasons we use off-site platforms like discord is because in matters like this they are so much more convenient.

Stamps should not be an issue. Should you be confirmed, the Delegate will no doubt grant you RO powers of communication, allowing you to mass-telegram people.

McChimp;3511 Wrote:2: Given that the mandate predates the assembly procedures act, I see no particular problem with it not meeting that standard. Despite this apparent shortcoming, the mandate is clear and concise. Changing it to meet a later standard doesn't have any real benefits and is risky.

So it is your position that the Mandate's formatting overrides those found in Acts of the Assembly? Does this mean I can use italics again Big Grin
#12
Oh, one more question Smile

Do you think Speakers should be able to vote?
#13
Mojo;3546 Wrote:Stamps should not be an issue. Should you be confirmed, the Delegate will no doubt grant you RO powers of communication, allowing you to mass-telegram people.

I'm not sure that could be limited to just citizens, but then again it could be used as a tool to encourage residents to take up citizenship. Maybe it could be a collaboration between myself and the relevant minister.

Quote:So it is your position that the Mandate's formatting overrides those found in Acts of the Assembly? Does this mean I can use italics again Big Grin 

No. It is my position that the mandate, which is exempted from formatting rules by the Assembly Procedure Act and predates that law anyway, does not need to be amended to meet those later standards. The Mandate does not serve as an exemplar of formatting; laws must meet the standards laid out in the Assembly Procedure Act before they can go to vote.

Mojo;3547 Wrote:Do you think Speakers should be able to vote?

Yes. I don't think not being able to vote makes somebody impartial and I'd rather see the Speaker's opinion above board.
#14
Thanks for your answers Smile
#15
I move for a vote.
#16
I second the motion
Assistant Minister for Media and Events
Former Chief Justice of the Grand Court
Former Vice Delegate
Former Guardian


 

[Image: 3cgBDsj.jpg]
#17
Bump
#18
I'd also like to second the motion to vote.
#19
A voting thread for this confirmation has been opened here.

Voting will end on Thursday the 27th September at 11:55 a.m. EDT.


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)