[Discussion] Appointment (November 2019)

[McChimp]

The Delegate has appointed Wymondham as a Court Justice.

Please discuss said appointment in this thread.

Per prior precedent, the minimum discussion period began at the time the Delegate posted the nominations ([font=Roboto,]11-06-2019, 10:10 PM[/font]).

 

[Roavin]

Relevant to this thread are Wym's answers here.

Wym seems to have a proper understanding of judicial interpretation, so I'm fine with the appointment.

 

[Deleted1]

Why again give it to someone who just resigned? Are they going to resign again after the backlog is done? It is also really bad form to begin the dicussion period before any actual dicussion thread was posted in the assembly. The prior precedent is bad.

 

[Wymondham]

Why again give it to someone who just resigned? Are they going to resign again after the backlog is done?

Yes that's the plan, when I left we didn't see this backlog occuring and I'm one of the most experienced people in Lazarus at this sort of stuff so after this back log is clear I'm gonna leave again to be replaced with a longer term replacement

 

[Deleted1]

Ok. Is there a lot of back log? How long do you expect to be in office?

 

[treadwellia]

We're hoping we can get things done by Christmas or sooner, ideally, Debussy.

 

[Imaginary]

Zad that there vaz no one apparent to appoint to the pozition long-term for thiz. But full zupport!

 

[McChimp]

I motion to vote.

 

[Imaginary]

I zecond the motion.

 

[Wymondham]

Seconded