Trainer Name: Frank the Tank Pokemon to enter (i.e. Bulbasaur): Alexander Hamilton

“People are different” isn’t an argument against this proposal. My question still stands

How

Can't think of any reason to oppose this.

Hey, I’m sure you saw, but I deleted the other post you quoted before you posted because I thought my post came across as too brash. Anyway, I agree with you, easiest solution is another poll: LazCorp vs this theme (not LazCorp vs 8 different other themes

Not my point. My point was that LazCorp is unpopular, not that the space theme was.

This literally builds a new regional identity into being a spaceship theme. In this poll 12/16 (62.5%) of citizens were for changing to a theme other than LazCorp: https://nslazarus.com/forum/index.php?threads/3425/ In this poll 6/9 (66.6%) of citizens were for changing to a theme other than...

Risk in what?

If you can’t find ideas being shot down in the past week, you’re not looking. I’m very surprised if you can’t find any examples yourself… I’m not going to post links and examples here as this isn’t the place to discuss this at length. This is to speak about this proposed amendment.

No, I’m not just taking about the themes. I’m taking about the last few suggestions over the past week that have been shot down without due cause

Using the theme in official correspondence over the forums does not constitute role play. Sure… that’s why a certain group of people continue to shoot down every idea of new legislation proposed? Seems to conflict with your reasoning I think you are correct in the emotional appeal aspect of...

I love the idea, & Constie’s suggestions once we kink out the titles

Just because people make graphics & art doesn’t mean they are participating in the role play. Rogernomics, I get you (& others) spent a good amount of time on graphics for this, and obviously everyone appreciates it. That doesn’t mean it is a logical reason to keep the theme. I fail to see how...

Writing laws that encourage but not compels parties to do something is not unheard of. However, I am on board with your idea as well. @Aga , thoughts?

I support this. Lazcorp is boring. I would rather have prime ministers, justices etc as our theme. That is what this proposal does

Would opponents of such legislation support a clause to ensure breaching this law is not punishable by the criminal code?

Ah yes, if VC means voice chat I would not be interested in that part!

Why would it work in TRR and not here?

You’ve already stated your point.

Love the idea. What does VC mean? & I don't like the idea of the Speaker filtering out questions. Can't the PM do it themselves if they wish not to answer? I don't think forcing the PM to give an answer is a good idea anyway -- they will just give a lame response if they don't want to answer...