I do think this should be helpful to get the region further and provide more consistent activity, waiting to see more opinions but I'd tend to be favorable for now.
I'd tend to be in favor of this idea but I'm a bit wary that a Prime Minister might use that unchecked power to sway citizenship applications in a direction that would favor the PM's interests.
What about a requirement for Delegate validation of the PM's decision? Other than that, it seems like...
I do think it could help the job of a Managing Director in forming a Cabinet but it'd probably require a bit more specifics on particular situations to prevent abuses.
Apart from that, I do think of the general idea of it as positive since it would allow some individuals locked in particular...
I think the amendment itself, with addition of New Rogernomics' suggestion of a limited window for withdrawal, would be a positive addition for future procedures.
I'm glad you both took the time to state the reasons behind your vote, as I prefer to have at least some bit of debating/explanations when a vote is controversial.
(Note that this was not personal, I just preferred to let people know why I believe Domais to be a good pick for this position)...
It seems the people who had issues with this nomination did not voiced out their concerns before the vote, neither in public, nor in my DMs, nor in this thread.
It seems like a waste of democratic debates to me, thus I will encourage abstaining fellow Shareholders to vote in favor of this...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.