Archived/Tabled [Amicus Curiae] New Rogernomics v. Mzeusia

[Demonos]

IN THE COURT OF THE REGION OF LAZARUS

CORPORATION OF LAZARUS


​

AMICUS CURIAE​

Now comes

Rules and Procedures" area of the Court's forum vacant as well asempty benches

Judicial Acts". Included under that title are documents like the "Criminal Procedure Act (November 2019)" which stipulates a framework for petitioning the court and illustrates a timeline for due process. Everyone should be aware of our "Criminal Code Act (September 2018)" and its latest July 2020 permutation that enumerates all the possible ways one can break the law as a shareholder. In fact, Demonos anticipates that responses to this thread may base arguments on these documents or the empowering Article V of the 12th Mandate

McChimp v. Vedan case. Demonos will not argue here if the rendered judgement by a resigned Justice was legal because the precedent does not exist to base an argument on. Nor is it the purpose of this amicus to overturn that decision. Rather, the point being sought here is that a judgement was made outside of constitutional requirements for three sitting Justices.[/size]





Respectfully Submitted,


Princess of Demons

 

[New Rogernomics]

You can't argue for dismissal of charges that have not been filled. 

I would have preferred that such a brief was put in the Board Meeting Room, rather than posted here.

Nevertheless, I will post a full explanation of the drafting of charges.

 

[Demonos]

You can't go about defaming citizens with drafts of indictments and threats.

 

[Demonos]

OBJECTION!

You can't go about creating law at your own whim. You are defaming a citizen of Lazarus with your drafts and threats. Either make formal charges or not at all.

 

[New Rogernomics]

OBJECTION!

You can't go about creating law at your own whim. You are defaming a citizen of Lazarus with your drafts and threats. Either make formal charges or not at all.

 

[Demonos]

OBJECTION!

You can't go about creating law at your own whim. You are defaming a citizen of Lazarus with your drafts and threats. Either make formal charges or not at all.

Defamation may not be but blackmail and sabotage surly are. We will see you in court.

 

[New Rogernomics]

OBJECTION!

You can't go about creating law at your own whim. You are defaming a citizen of Lazarus with your drafts and threats. Either make formal charges or not at all.

Defamation may not be but blackmail and sabotage surly are. We will see you in court.