![]() |
[Discussion] New Themes - Printable Version +- Forums (https://nslazarus.com/old_forum) +-- Forum: Second Floor (https://nslazarus.com/old_forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=112) +--- Forum: Board Meeting Room (https://nslazarus.com/old_forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=19) +---- Forum: Past Proposals & Discussions (https://nslazarus.com/old_forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=50) +---- Thread: [Discussion] New Themes (/showthread.php?tid=554) |
RE: [DISCUSSION] New Themes - New Rogernomics - 01-23-2019 Wycliffe;5420 Wrote:The more I think about it, the more I'm coming around the idea that we might not want to have an official theme. Placing ourselves in a certain theme is bound to always be unsatisfactory to a solid chunk of the population- most people don't like LazCorp, and of them, they're all divided on what they want to replace it. I think in the long run, we may find more potential to develop our own, unique identity without shoehorning ourselves into a particular set of titles and culture that we may soon grow tired of- as with what happened to the HRL, the CU, the Realms, etc.We already have theme neutral names in our constitution, so we don't need to legislate for new names. Instead we'd just remove LazCorp, and it would revert to Delegate and Minister,etc. RE: [DISCUSSION] New Themes - Arlo - 01-23-2019 New Rogernomics;5465 Wrote:Arlo;5464 Wrote:At the end of the day I don't really care what the theme is. Lazcorp is fun, though it feels to me like it works better as a meme and informal theme than an actual regional identity. Not sure I can agree with that. Theming isn't just a legal issue -- it's part of our regional identity, and it has strong potential for both spurring and stifling activity. What I'm trying to say is -- to me anyway, it has always looked like Lazarus has been trying to adapt itself to a theme, rather than the other way around. I hope that makes some sense. RE: [DISCUSSION] New Themes - New Rogernomics - 01-23-2019 Arlo;5473 Wrote:If anything throughout the Humane Republic, Celestial Union, and before then, theming distracted from running the region, and the People's Republic which people have nostalgia about wasn't even native to Lazarus - given it was literally a project of NPO infiltrators that collapsed after the New Lazarene Order.New Rogernomics;5465 Wrote:Arlo;5464 Wrote:At the end of the day I don't really care what the theme is. Lazcorp is fun, though it feels to me like it works better as a meme and informal theme than an actual regional identity. What I am trying to say is that right now Lazarus has no real theme, and more just corporate titles that have renamed generic titles like Delegate and Minister. If you want an example of a in-depth themed region still functioning with a really expansive lore and theme going on, the closest to that would be 10k Islands or Unknown. The Nationstates trend is really moving away from theme-based governments though, and more towards generic governments, with regions generally following the generic parliamentary or presidential models. If you are looking to what a Lazarene theme could look like, then there have been quite a few attempts by regions over the years, with varying degrees of success to try different themed government styles. We know of these styles of course:
RE: [DISCUSSION] New Themes - New Rogernomics - 01-23-2019 Aumelodia;5383 Wrote:Well it looks like there’s a substantial amount of support for LazCorp. That’s good, because it means no hassle, as long as people are actually determined to keep it going ideally permanently. I have no problem with LazCorp if people are dedicated to it.The most successful model has always been generic. Take TNP, TSP, and Europeia, for example, which might do a little titling but follow more after RL government styles than any precise theme. 10k islands managed to pull it off, but they put many years of effort in to make it work. RE: [DISCUSSION] New Themes - Wycliffe - 01-24-2019 I would argue that the failure of the Realms had a great deal to do with the people entrusted to create them. Something we may forget is that we had something like four Realms, and each one was given to a prominent Lazarene (Rog, Funk and Harm among them, IIRC, and one other) to do what they wanted with it. Instead of completely organic development, what we ended up with was one or two Realms developing as the brainchild of whichever person controlled it, and the others dead in the water because their people didn't put any effort into it. The Realm leaders all ran in completely different directions, which gave the region no real sense of a unified culture- just four different, unevenly-developed fragments of one. I believe we could make something like that work again, but it could not be structured in the same way, which gave too much free rein to the people to whom the Realms were assigned. And given that I don't think the appetite right now is to focus our regional efforts on developing something that deep or complex, it might be much simpler to abolish official theming. We have some scraps of a sense of regional identity. We tend towards green, and we like to use the phoenix. The rest can kind of flow from there, I think. RE: [DISCUSSION] New Themes - Arlo - 01-24-2019 New Rogernomics;5474 Wrote:What I am trying to say is that right now Lazarus has no real theme, and more just corporate titles that have renamed generic titles like Delegate and Minister. I don't disagree haha. It's part of what I meant by "Lazcorp is fun, though it feels to me like it works better as a meme and informal theme than an actual regional identity." I'm not advocating any particular position really. I'm just saying we don't need an intense pre-constructed theme. Why can't we just be Lazarus? Is that not enough?? RE: [DISCUSSION] New Themes - Wycliffe - 01-24-2019 I agree. And some of us find LazCorp more boring than anything. I'd rather tear it down and let us be just Lazarus for a bit. See what shakes out. |