+- Forums (https://nslazarus.com/old_forum)
+-- Forum: Second Floor (https://nslazarus.com/old_forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=112)
+--- Forum: Board Meeting Room (https://nslazarus.com/old_forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=19)
+---- Forum: Past Proposals & Discussions (https://nslazarus.com/old_forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=50)
+---- Thread: Pax Poukai Treaty (/showthread.php?tid=1213)
Pages:
1
2
RE: Pax Poukai Treaty Discussion - McChimp - 02-09-2020
joWhatup;8273 Wrote:This has gone unnoticed for a while it seems. We might as well get things moving, so are there any other concerns on this?
We're waiting for TSP's elections to finish atm
RE: Pax Poukai Treaty Discussion - Chanku - 02-09-2020
Personally, I have a slight issue with the word "shall", albeit I will admit it's more of a personal style thing, I don't particularly think "shall" should be used in Legal Documents and there is almost always a better word. Albeit there are only four instances of the word, but still.
RE: Pax Poukai Treaty Discussion - joWhatup - 02-10-2020
McChimp;8276 Wrote:joWhatup;8273 Wrote:This has gone unnoticed for a while it seems. We might as well get things moving, so are there any other concerns on this?
We're waiting for TSP's elections to finish atm
Ah, that makes sense. Thanks for the explanation, I was wondering.
RE: Pax Poukai Treaty Discussion - Zapatian Workers State - 02-13-2020
I am in favor of this treaty, as I feel that this could be the beginning of a promising inter-regional cultural exchange, which may in time blossom into a fully fledged military coalition. I am in favor of any resolution which furthers Lazarene hegemony and influence gameside, whether through an approach of official congeniality or otherwise, insofar as such an approach is consistent with the current state of foreign relations. The South Pacific is a friendly, mighty, and democratic region, and we should only be honored to stand in solidarity against factions promoting tyranny and oppression.
RE: Pax Poukai Treaty Discussion - Imaginary - 02-14-2020
Considering the widespread approval from those that have commented, I now motion this treaty to vote.
In response to Chanku's mild concern over the use of shall; I don't know that shall is the best word to be using throughout the treaty myself, but it has certainly seemed to perform its legal purpose well previously and I don't think it will create any confusion in the document. For this reason I suggest we abide with its use, and find reading for the sake of beautiful word choice somewhere other than our Assembly's legislative counter.<3
RE: Pax Poukai Treaty Discussion - McChimp - 02-14-2020
I second the motion
RE: Pax Poukai Treaty Discussion - Debussy - 02-20-2020
Shareholders of Lazarus,
With 12 Aye, 0 No, and 1 Abstain, the Treaty of Pax Poukai has passed.