+- Forums (https://nslazarus.com/old_forum)
+-- Forum: Second Floor (https://nslazarus.com/old_forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=112)
+--- Forum: Board Meeting Room (https://nslazarus.com/old_forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=19)
+---- Forum: Past Proposals & Discussions (https://nslazarus.com/old_forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=50)
+---- Thread: Warzones Incorporated (/showthread.php?tid=1580)
Pages:
1
2
Warzones Incorporated - joWhatup - 08-09-2020
This was a project started under my predecessor, Sylven. Following change in the Warzones, it came to a stop. Recently, we’ve renegotiated with Warzone Africa and Warzone Asia to present to you the following draft:
Quote:Introduction
Warzones Incorporated is a subsidiary company of the Corporation of Lazarus, aimed at providing a more sophisticated presence in NationStates for Warzone communities, and a greater influence in their affairs for LazCorp. For the following sections, LazCorp refers to the government of LazCorp, and a Warzone refers to the government of a game-created Warzone region, as acknowledged by LazCorp.
Obligations
LazCorp must work to protect the associated regions of Warzones Inc. from takeover.
LazCorp (with the blessing of the Warzone in question) may help Incorporated Warzones with:
- recruitment of new member nations,
- cultural activity organization,
- regional security,
- and forging diplomatic connections.
Incorporated Warzones must:
- provide military support (if available) to the Lazarene Guard,
- acquiesce to diplomatic changes in their region demanded by LazCorp,
- and mention their Warzones Inc. membership in their region's WFE when in their control.
Membership
A Warzone will be Incorporated if it agrees to join Warzones Inc. and LazCorp accepts it as a member.
LazCorp may remove a Warzone from Warzones Inc. at any time by notifying the Warzone in question that they're being removed from the agreement.
Any Warzone may leave Warzones Inc. at any time by telling LazCorp that they're leaving the agreement. A three-day grace period will be granted to the Warzone to decide it's course.
Thoughts, comments, etc. would be appreciated!
RE: Warzones Incorporated - Debussy - 08-10-2020
Any time LazCorp makes a decision and LazCorp is the cabinet, does that mean the cabinet must decide altogether, by vote, or what?
RE: Warzones Incorporated - Ryccia - 08-10-2020
I believe LazCorp refers to the state, not the Cabinet alone. As the Prime Minister is the Head of Government, I suppose their decision is final.
RE: Warzones Incorporated - Debussy - 08-10-2020
It doesn't, Ryccia, but it should.
Quote:For the following sections, LazCorp refers to the Cabinet of LazCorp
Furthermore, are we really going to protect warzones without a guard captain and the 3 people, including myself, who are willing to go on operations? I don't see the point in all this when we can't even do what it obliges.
I see the cabinet disowning a warzone we can't save, which they can easily do in this treaty, and if that's the case, there is no point to this document.
RE: Warzones Incorporated - joWhatup - 08-10-2020
Debussy;10189 Wrote:It doesn't, Ryccia, but it should.
Quote:For the following sections, LazCorp refers to the Cabinet of LazCorp
Furthermore, are we really going to protect warzones without a guard captain and the 3 people, including myself, who are willing to go on operations? I don't see the point in all this when we can't even do what it obliges.
I see the cabinet disowning a warzone we can't save, which they can easily do in this treaty, and if that's the case, there is no point to this document.
I hope future cabinets are smart enough to realise how unreliable and spineless they seem if they simply abandon protectorates as soon as they are raided. As to the Guard thing, while a fair point, we are also not without resources. We can always call upon allies and friendly forces, as well as drive recruitment internally.
RE: Warzones Incorporated - Ryccia - 08-10-2020
Debussy;10189 Wrote:It doesn't, Ryccia, but it should.
Quote:For the following sections, LazCorp refers to the Cabinet of LazCorp
Furthermore, are we really going to protect warzones without a guard captain and the 3 people, including myself, who are willing to go on operations? I don't see the point in all this when we can't even do what it obliges.
I see the cabinet disowning a warzone we can't save, which they can easily do in this treaty, and if that's the case, there is no point to this document.
Sorry about my oversight, my mistake.
RE: Warzones Incorporated - Debussy - 08-11-2020
[Table][cell]
LazCorp refers to the Cabinet of LazCorp
[/cell][/table]Can we change this to this?
[Table][cell]
LazCorp refers to the government of Lazarus
[/cell][/table]
RE: Warzones Incorporated - Debussy - 08-11-2020
@"demonos" I wasn't...I'm not sure if that was a slight. I am not sure what I did in your mind to deserve it, either.
The changes I suggested would make it clear the PM's decision would be the final say.
RE: Warzones Incorporated - Debussy - 08-11-2020
I see what you mean, but the constitution is not structured that way. I am not trying to insult you, but the PM has direction over FA.
RE: Warzones Incorporated - temmi - 08-12-2020
I think this is a good idea, but not one that our region seems prepared to commit to at this time. I think we should be more focused on activity and engagement in our own community, before committing to aiding other regions in the same ways.
Again, I think this is a really great idea and I look forward to when we have the resources and people in order to help other regions. From my experiences here so far, I think our efforts would be better spent on focusing internally. I don't see how we can fulfill any of the promises that this document would have us make.