Discussion Should we have an embassy exchange with The Pacific?

[Ellenburg#8639]

Since there were some concerns about the proposed Embassy with The Pacific. I am running a poll to see how the regions feel on this subject.

 

[Wang Yao]

Normalization of our relations with the NPO have my support, as I believe it to be both necessary and beneficial , let's see what other people think of it.

 

[Wymondham]

I am very much in favour of this

 

[Deleted1]

I think the embassy should go last on our list and stay there.

 

[New Rogernomics]

I don't see issues with an embassy as I might with a treaty. Embassies are essentially obligation free beyond a monthly regional update if that, and unlike treaties can be rescinded if need be fairly quickly. That's my opinion as a private citizen.

From a diplomatic point of view, now that The Pacific has signed strong mutual defence treaties with so many of our regional friends and allies, ignoring The Pacific diplomatically and having no diplomatic relations isn't realistic or practical. Especially not as it was before major changes like the Gameplay Compact, which was recently signed on NSGP.

Indeed some of our regional friends and allies might be offended by the notion that they'd ever put us in danger when they've held sincere treaty negotiations with the NPO with recognition of current obligations in mind. At the very least we are now indirectly protected from the NPO by those obligations, should anything happen with ourselves and the NPO now and into the future.

 

[Leonism]

Yes. At this point I think reconcilliation with the Pacific is the way forward. I see no benefit in having ended the war without trying to "win the peace" as well.

 

[Ellenburg#8639]

The vote looks like the Embassy with The Pacific is fine with the region. So I will be closing this thread and moving forward with the Embassy.