Ruling Is an armistice reconcilable with an existing war resolution?

[New Rogernomics]

I hate creating more work for the court. Unfortunately, there is nothing in law providing for an armistice or mentioning it, and it is being advocated as a measure where the government may sign off on a measure to stop military engagements with the NPO.

This could require:
- A vote to repeal the declaration of war by two thirds vote.
- A vote only to approve an armistice by two thirds vote.
- Recognition that the government has the power constitutionally to suspend carrying out aspects of a war resolution, rather than just informally not taking actions against the NPO.

So for the future we will need clarification on the powers granted to a government versus the power of the assembly to charge a government to implement a war resolution.

Would an armistice be reconcilable with existing laws/resolutions passed by the assembly such as a war resolution?

 

[Wymondham]

The court wishes to call the Managing Director @joWhatup to answer a question as it was his idea which lead to this question:
What form would this armistice take, what would Lazarus undertake as a course of this armistice?

 

[joWhatup]

The court wishes to call the Managing Director @JoWhatUp to answer a question as it was his idea which lead to this question:
What form would this armistice take, what would Lazarus undertake as a course of this armistice?

It would ensure the NPO would not take offensive action (military, intelligence, etc.) towards Lazarus, in return for Lazarus doing the same.

 

[Wymondham]

There is no provision for the implementation and/or approval of an armistice in Lazarene law. The court therefore holds that any such declaration would be null and void and thus this is a matter for the assembly to legislate on, either by an amendment to Mandate 12 or to the Charter of the Regional Guard or both