Welcome to Lazarus

Please register to view all features

Ruling Is an armistice reconcilable with an existing war resolution?

Ruling has been made.
Status
Not open for further replies.

New Rogernomics

Councilor (75%)
Staff member
First Citizen (PM)
Herald
D. Epistates
Epilektoi (CLS)
Citizen
Resident (Lazarus)
Verified
Joined
Jun 12, 2018
Messages
2,994
Feather
ƒ4,512
Litten
Charmander
Nation
New Rogernomics
Region
Lazarus
I hate creating more work for the court. Unfortunately, there is nothing in law providing for an armistice or mentioning it, and it is being advocated as a measure where the government may sign off on a measure to stop military engagements with the NPO.

This could require:
- A vote to repeal the declaration of war by two thirds vote.
- A vote only to approve an armistice by two thirds vote.
- Recognition that the government has the power constitutionally to suspend carrying out aspects of a war resolution, rather than just informally not taking actions against the NPO.

So for the future we will need clarification on the powers granted to a government versus the power of the assembly to charge a government to implement a war resolution.

Would an armistice be reconcilable with existing laws/resolutions passed by the assembly such as a war resolution?
 
Wymondham;9840 said:
The court wishes to call the Managing Director @JoWhatUp to answer a question as it was his idea which lead to this question:
What form would this armistice take, what would Lazarus undertake as a course of this armistice?

It would ensure the NPO would not take offensive action (military, intelligence, etc.) towards Lazarus, in return for Lazarus doing the same.
 
There is no provision for the implementation and/or approval of an armistice in Lazarene law. The court therefore holds that any such declaration would be null and void and thus this is a matter for the assembly to legislate on, either by an amendment to Mandate 12 or to the Charter of the Regional Guard or both
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top