Welcome to Lazarus

Please register to view all features

Archived/Tabled [Amicus Curiae] New Rogernomics v. Mzeusia

  • Thread starter Demonos
  • Start date
  • Tagged users None
This has been archived or tabled.
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

Demonos

Guest
IN THE COURT OF THE REGION OF LAZARUS

CORPORATION OF LAZARUS


AMICUS CURIAE


Now comes

Rules and Procedures" area of the Court's forum vacant as well asempty benches

Judicial Acts". Included under that title are documents like the "Criminal Procedure Act (November 2019)" which stipulates a framework for petitioning the court and illustrates a timeline for due process. Everyone should be aware of our "Criminal Code Act (September 2018)" and its latest July 2020 permutation that enumerates all the possible ways one can break the law as a shareholder. In fact, Demonos anticipates that responses to this thread may base arguments on these documents or the empowering Article V of the 12th Mandate

McChimp v. Vedan case. Demonos will not argue here if the rendered judgement by a resigned Justice was legal because the precedent does not exist to base an argument on. Nor is it the purpose of this amicus to overturn that decision. Rather, the point being sought here is that a judgement was made outside of constitutional requirements for three sitting Justices.[/size]





Respectfully Submitted,


Princess of Demons
 
You can't argue for dismissal of charges that have not been filled. 

I would have preferred that such a brief was put in the Board Meeting Room, rather than posted here.

Nevertheless, I will post a full explanation of the drafting of charges.
 
You can't go about defaming citizens with drafts of indictments and threats.
 

OBJECTION!

You can't go about creating law at your own whim. You are defaming a citizen of Lazarus with your drafts and threats. Either make formal charges or not at all.
 
Demonos;10541 said:

OBJECTION!

You can't go about creating law at your own whim. You are defaming a citizen of Lazarus with your drafts and threats. Either make formal charges or not at all.
 
New?Rogernomics;10543 said:
Demonos;10541 said:

OBJECTION!

You can't go about creating law at your own whim. You are defaming a citizen of Lazarus with your drafts and threats. Either make formal charges or not at all.

Defamation may not be but blackmail and sabotage surly are. We will see you in court.
 
Demonos;10544 said:
New?Rogernomics;10543 said:
Demonos;10541 said:

OBJECTION!

You can't go about creating law at your own whim. You are defaming a citizen of Lazarus with your drafts and threats. Either make formal charges or not at all.

Defamation may not be but blackmail and sabotage surly are. We will see you in court.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top