Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]



Welcome to the forums of the Undead Dominion of Lazarus. We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features

Username:   Password:
Image hosting by Photobucket
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 3
[SC] Repeal "Condemn the Pacific"
Topic Started: May 3 2016, 07:00 AM (488 Views)
Altmoras
Member Avatar
Former Something
WA Page

NS Forum Discussion

Well, considering that they were condemned in the first place in great part due to couping Lazarus and the fact that the Grand Assembly has condemned the resolution author for his coup in Osiris it would probably best if we voted against the repeal imo.

Discuss.
Mini Profile Top
 
Campinia
Member Avatar
Lazarene
As with all Repeal Commend proposals, if the only reason you can offer is "They apologised" or "They stopped doing it", automatic AGAINST. Just because they "stopped doing" the things they got condemned for, doesn't mean they never did them. For me, a condemn proposal is a snapshot in time. As long as there isn't anything factually untrue about the proposal itself, it should ideally never be repealed.


And that's not even going into the specifics of this proposal or its author, which would sway my vote even if I weren't categorically opposed to this type of repeals...
Mini Profile Top
 
Starberry
Member Avatar
Look At How She Sparkles
Against.

Edit: I don't really have much to say on this. One disingenuous apology doesn't make the things they did go away.
Edited by Starberry, May 3 2016, 08:23 AM.
Mini Profile Top
 
Wintermoot
Member Avatar
Like Love At First Sight <3
Against.

I'm curious though...assuming that our official stance is against, since the Delegate is voting against, are we doing anything on the FA front to shore up support against this repeal? From what I can tell, there's a decent amount of support for repealing the condemnation, and it would possibly be succeeding right now had someone else written it up.
Edited by Wintermoot, May 3 2016, 01:35 PM.
Mini Profile Top
 
Loftegen
Member Avatar
Supreme Autocrat
Wintermoot
May 3 2016, 01:35 PM
Against.

I'm curious though...assuming that our official stance is against, since the Delegate is voting against, are we doing anything on the FA front to shore up support against this repeal? From what I can tell, there's a decent amount of support for repealing the condemnation, and it would possibly be succeeding right now had someone else written it up.
I don't think we have an official stance: that would take a Grand Assembly resolution. My statement was more me sharing my opinion as a private citizen, rather than as Sovereign. Still, I have to admit that it never really occured to me to lobby for a vote against. What would be the best way to go about that? Posting in the Gameplay subforum? RMB posts in regions we have embassies with? Something else?
Mini Profile Top
 
Wintermoot
Member Avatar
Like Love At First Sight <3
I have to admit, this sort of thing is one of my weak points, but perhaps others better connected with NS politics than I can answer how to go about it. I imagine that it begins with making a case for retaining the condemnation, and then making the case to people whose votes would be important on the matter, particularly other GCR delegates, possibly cultivating better relations in general with those regions in the process. As I understand it, the NPO has been doing this on their end for some time and has been making a good bit of headway. It's unfortunate for them that the person that ended up writing the proposal was Cormac, and that he wrote it for the obvious purpose of attempting to further legitimize his recent actions instead of anything actually having to do with the Lazarus coup or the NPO. You could also probably consult with treaty partners, who would presumably be more open to working with Lazarus on an issue it considered important.

If Lazarus officially considers retaining the condemnation important, that is. There's a case to be made for not considering it to be important too.
Mini Profile Top
 
Dyr Nasad
Member Avatar
Lazarene
Wintermoot
May 3 2016, 05:20 PM
I imagine that it begins with making a case for retaining the condemnation, and then making the case to people whose votes would be important on the matter, particularly other GCR delegates, possibly cultivating better relations in general with those regions in the process.
Basically this. Posts in NSGP and RMBs are not going to be as helpful until you have built up good relations with the key players
Mini Profile Top
 
The Church of Satan
Member Avatar
I HAVE CHORTLES!
Against.

I've made my reasons quite clear in the SC thread.
Mini Profile Top
 
Saeturn Valerius Liberalis
Member Avatar
Mild Annoyance
It looks like it's going to fail handily.
Mini Profile Top
 
Funkadelia
Member Avatar

Wintermoot
May 3 2016, 01:35 PM
Against.

I'm curious though...assuming that our official stance is against, since the Delegate is voting against, are we doing anything on the FA front to shore up support against this repeal? From what I can tell, there's a decent amount of support for repealing the condemnation, and it would possibly be succeeding right now had someone else written it up.
There is no need to because I am confident in its failure.
Mini Profile Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · World Assembly Archive · Next Topic »
Image hosting by Photobucket
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 3


Theme by Sith - Recolored by Seth of Outline