Welcome Guest
[Log In]
[Register]
Welcome to the forums of the Undead Dominion of Lazarus. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features |
Court Inquiry re: GOF; Court Inquiry into alleged criminal activities | |
---|---|
Tweet Topic Started: Apr 15 2016, 12:28 PM (1,052 Views) | |
Amerion | Apr 15 2016, 12:28 PM Post #1 |
Star Destroyer
|
The full bench of the Court is in agreement that proceedings will go forward to reexamine the feasibility of perusing a criminal case into the alleged crimes committed by what is commonly known as the Gang of Five. For the record, the Court acknowledges a prior criminal complaint filed by The Church of Satan as being the basis for this inquiry. The complaint filed accuses Stujenske, Feux, Pergamon, Milograd/Yao, A Mean Old Man of aggression, harassment, subversion, conspiracy, fraud, forum destruction, and deserting the then administration. At this time, the Court seeks a citizen of Lazarus to come forward and volunteer their services as a representative of the public and to operate in the capacity of prosecutor for the duration of this case. |
The Church of Satan | Apr 15 2016, 05:51 PM Post #2 |
I HAVE CHORTLES!
|
If it would please the court, I volunteer to be the public's representative. |
Loftegen | Apr 15 2016, 06:19 PM Post #3 |
Supreme Autocrat
|
Thanks, CoS! Give 'em hell! |
Amerion | Apr 16 2016, 11:18 AM Post #4 |
Star Destroyer
|
Duly noted. The Court shall consult with one another as to the steps we take from here. Please be patient. |
Milograd | Apr 17 2016, 05:17 AM Post #5 |
Heir Hazard
|
Bold mine. Is that to literally say the premises, both logical and judicial, of a potential trial are going to be examined, or that you're just going to pursue a trial? |
Amerion | Apr 17 2016, 08:06 AM Post #6 |
Star Destroyer
|
With regards to Milograd's question, the Court seeks to examine whether there are grounds to warrant a trial. At present, a majority of Justices are uncertain if it is judicially legitimate for a Court of the Humane Republic of Lazarus to preside over a trial of individuals accused of crimes allegedly committed in the era and under the judicial code of the People's Republic of Lazarus. The Court invites submissions by interested parties to address the aforementioned question. Please have these briefs submitted in 72 hours of this post so the Court can make an informed determination. |
Funkadelia | Apr 17 2016, 07:37 PM Post #7 |
|
What is the point in having a "prosecutor" if there is no legal need to have one? The entire basis of this court is to do the fact finding, not having someone do it for them. |
Loftegen | Apr 17 2016, 09:15 PM Post #8 |
Supreme Autocrat
|
I've spent a year trying to ban the Gang of Five from Lazarus via clauses in the original Mandate, via an amendment to the mandate, and via statute, only to be told over and over that the Grand Court is the best/correct/only legitimate way to go, and now you're not sure it would be legitimate to try them under their own laws? A year of delay, obfuscation, foot-dragging and excuse-making does not engender confidence in the Grand Court. The task before you is simple: examine the evidence and decide whether the members of the Gang of Five, individually and/or collectively, violated the People's Republic of Lazarus laws they are accused of breaking; and if you find they did, recommend punishments according to those same laws. I urge you to get to it. |
Loftegen | Apr 17 2016, 09:25 PM Post #9 |
Supreme Autocrat
|
I agree; some members of the Grand Court seem intent on ignoring the Unified Legal Code, specifically:
Indeed it seems that a trial, as such, would be illegal! |
The Church of Satan | Apr 18 2016, 03:05 AM Post #10 |
I HAVE CHORTLES!
|
Chief Justice, I enter into evidence the following http://www.nationstates.net/page=display_region_rmb/region=lazarus?jump_to_page=836&start=20875 http://www.nationstates.net/page=display_region_rmb/region=lazarus?start=20925 http://www.nationstates.net/page=display_region_rmb/region=lazarus?start=21000 NPO Official Statement http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=337955&start=150#p24288139 Motion For a Vote of No Confidence in Stujenske Plebiscite Vote of No Confidence in Stujesnke] WA Condemnation of Stujenske for His Betrayal of Lazarus WA Condemnation of The Pacific For It's Involvement in The Coup of Lazarus [I'd like to remind the court that as a result The Pacific became the first GCR in the entire history of NationStates to be condemned, specifically for masterminding the coup.] Will the court be taking into account the preliminary evidence from the first criminal complaint or will I be required to re-submit it? |
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) |
Go to Next Page | |
« Previous Topic · Court Archive · Next Topic » |
Track Topic · E-mail Topic | 11:31 PM Jul 10 |
Theme by Sith - Recolored by Seth of Outline