Welcome Guest
[Log In]
[Register]
Welcome to the forums of the Undead Dominion of Lazarus. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features |
Request for review: Loftegen's appointment of "acting" cabinet members | |
---|---|
Tweet Topic Started: Apr 6 2016, 09:13 PM (602 Views) | |
Funkadelia | Apr 6 2016, 09:13 PM Post #1 |
|
If it pleases the court, I hereby submit the following actions by Sovereign Loftegen to the court for review. On 6 April 2016, Loftegen made an address regarding the absence of current Grand Commandant of the Guards Kazmr and, to the point of contention in this court, appointed Horse as "acting" grand commandant. I posit that this action is illegal under the Constitution of Lazarus, based on the following clause:
Allowing the Sovereign to appoint "acting" cabinet officials allows them to circumvent the requirement of having the citizens vote on their nomination for as long as they feel. I submit this government policy to the court for review. Edited by Funkadelia, Apr 6 2016, 09:13 PM.
|
Replies: | |
---|---|
Constie | Apr 8 2016, 03:13 PM Post #11 |
Chief Justice Emeritus of the Grand Court
|
I am of the opinion that Horse is NOT the Grand Commandant until he is confirmed as such. I also believe that the other officers should have a say in the matter before Horse is made to have a confirmation hearing by the Grand Assembly. The Mandate provides for a way of a new cabinet being appointed, but says nothing of appointed an Interim minister or "acting" minister. If the Lazarene Liberation Army chooses to appoint an Acting Grand Commandant, that decision should come from the current acting officers Edited by Constie, Apr 8 2016, 03:16 PM.
|
Harmoneia | Apr 8 2016, 03:26 PM Post #12 |
Mhysa
|
it means the "unless there's an officer confirmed to be Grand Commandant" in other words, The Grand Commandant should be an active serving Officer/Commandant of Guards, unless they refuse to be Grand Commandant, or fails to be confirmed as Grand Commandant, not officer. Officers are freely appointed by Commandant. |
Constie | Apr 8 2016, 03:38 PM Post #13 |
Chief Justice Emeritus of the Grand Court
|
Another thing, I also doubt the legality of Loftegen's ability to appoint an officer, rather than asking Kazmr by telegram or conferring with the incumbent officers. Regardless of past service, the speed of Horse's ascent to being nominated for Grand Commandant indicates that the LLA is losing its ability to handle its internal affairs, which worries me a great deal. For the time being, i request that the Confirmation process for Horse be postponed until this matter can be investigated to its fullest extent.
Edited by Constie, Apr 8 2016, 03:39 PM.
|
Loftegen | Apr 8 2016, 05:04 PM Post #14 |
Supreme Autocrat
|
That's an opinion I share: Horse is not the Grand Commandant, yet. The Grand Assembly has yet to confirm him in that office. He is, however, acting as Grand Commandant; I think that fact deserves recognition, hence the 'Acting Grand Commandant' tag. The Mandate gives officers no special say in who the Grand Commandant is. The Mandate does allow officers to create new ranks within their own class (Commandant of Guards) and the enlisted class (Army Guards) by majority vote, and to veto the dismissal of members by the Grand Commandant by a two-thirds vote. It says nothing about them choosing a new Grand Commandant from amongst themselves. The Sovereign might poll them for their opinion, but in the end the decision is his, not theirs. Finally, if the Sovereign cannot appoint Acting Ministers, how can the officers of the LLA do so? |
Loftegen | Apr 8 2016, 05:09 PM Post #15 |
Supreme Autocrat
|
That may be what the Framer intended it to mean, and I'll even concede that that is the meaning. It does, however, remain a poorly worded clause, and should be amended to clear up the potential abiguity. |
Loftegen | Apr 8 2016, 05:15 PM Post #16 |
Supreme Autocrat
|
It's also worth noting that the Mandate doesn't make any mention of the Grand Commandant being able to appoint officers either. |
Funkadelia | Apr 8 2016, 06:04 PM Post #17 |
|
Is this the court's official ruling or...? |
Loftegen | Apr 8 2016, 06:13 PM Post #18 |
Supreme Autocrat
|
Wouldn't an official opinion come with a write-up of the reasoning behind it? I would certainly hope so... |
Powthran | Apr 8 2016, 07:38 PM Post #19 |
Lazarene
|
I feel confident in saying that isn't the official ruling. We will have one soon though. |
Constie | Apr 8 2016, 07:45 PM Post #20 |
Chief Justice Emeritus of the Grand Court
|
no, the justices still have to meet and officially decide |
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) |
Go to Next Page | |
« Previous Topic · Court Archive · Next Topic » |
Track Topic · E-mail Topic | 11:31 PM Jul 10 |
Theme by Sith - Recolored by Seth of Outline