Gang of Five Ruling: What Now?

Welcome to the forums of the Undead Dominion of Lazarus. We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features

Pages:
1
…
7
8

Gang of Five Ruling: What Now?
Tweet Topic Started: Dec 13 2015, 10:47 PM (1,467 Views)
Milograd	Dec 13 2015, 10:47 PM Post #1
Heir Hazard Posts: 54 Group: Members Member #198 Joined: Sep 22, 2015	Files were charged against "the Gang of Five" (as one person) in late September...and it's December now. The Chief Justice presiding over the case has resigned, judgement has been delayed thrice over, and the initial trial was remarkably disorganized to begin with. What's the plan now?

Replies:
Powthran	Feb 21 2016, 10:14 PM Post #71
Lazarene Posts: 523 Group: Members Member #103 Joined: Apr 22, 2015 Alignment Lawful Neutral Military Stance Uninterested Political Views Conservative Nation in Lazarus Powthran	I am fine with making a ruling now with the current judges, but I understand the desire to have a retrial. A compromise could be to reopen the case for new evidence for anyone who doesn't feel like they got there say 6 months ago and since we now have two new justices. Does that seem fair?



Milograd	Feb 22 2016, 01:46 AM Post #72
Heir Hazard Posts: 54 Group: Members Member #198 Joined: Sep 22, 2015	Powthran Feb 21 2016, 10:14 PM I am fine with making a ruling now with the current judges, but I understand the desire to have a retrial. A compromise could be to reopen the case for new evidence for anyone who doesn't feel like they got there say 6 months ago and since we now have two new justices. Does that seem fair? There should absolutely be a retrial. And it should be thorough. The previous "trial" charged five individuals as a single person, and went off the rails before it even truly began. There was, for instance, at least a full page of me defending myself against forum destruction charges -- forum destruction charges that I needed to defend myself against because I was treated as five people. Treating five people was one person is, in no court of law, fair. I have a case to make for myself and I hope the court will formally allow me their ears. I have given my time and cooperation to this endeavor and hope Lazarus will continue to return the favor. I really am thankful for the court's treatment of me; I'm not blind to the fact that most of you think I'm guilty. For you to give me my day in court, and the opportunity to tell my side of the story anyway, reflects very well on the new government. Edited by Milograd, Feb 22 2016, 01:51 AM.



Constie	Mar 1 2016, 01:09 PM Post #73
Chief Justice Emeritus of the Grand Court Posts: 830 Group: Accused Member #132 Joined: Apr 28, 2015 Alignment Lawful Good Military Stance Neutral Political Views Independent	The trial should start today, but I need to make sure everyone is ready



Loftegen	Mar 6 2016, 08:55 AM Post #74
Supreme Autocrat Posts: 11,070 Group: Members Member #108 Joined: Apr 23, 2015 Alignment Lawful Good Military Stance Neutral Political Views Independent	Status report, please. Is anything happening?



Constie	Mar 7 2016, 04:06 PM Post #75
Chief Justice Emeritus of the Grand Court Posts: 830 Group: Accused Member #132 Joined: Apr 28, 2015 Alignment Lawful Good Military Stance Neutral Political Views Independent	To be frank, no. I want to issue judgements on those who havent shown



Powthran	Mar 8 2016, 04:16 AM Post #76
Lazarene Posts: 523 Group: Members Member #103 Joined: Apr 22, 2015 Alignment Lawful Neutral Military Stance Uninterested Political Views Conservative Nation in Lazarus Powthran	Seems like the best course is to begin a trial for Milograd and to issue the judgement on the rest of them. We probably can't officially do that without a Chief Justice, so I will just vote for Constie to be the new Chief Justice, which should be majority if he accepts.



Constie	Apr 8 2016, 12:16 PM Post #77
Chief Justice Emeritus of the Grand Court Posts: 830 Group: Accused Member #132 Joined: Apr 28, 2015 Alignment Lawful Good Military Stance Neutral Political Views Independent	Powthran Mar 8 2016, 04:16 AM Seems like the best course is to begin a trial for Milograd and to issue the judgement on the rest of them. We probably can't officially do that without a Chief Justice, so I will just vote for Constie to be the new Chief Justice, which should be majority if he accepts. I humbly accept the nomination



1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · Court Archive · Next Topic »

Pages:
1
…
7
8