Welcome Guest
[Log In]
[Register]
Welcome to the forums of the Undead Dominion of Lazarus. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
Request for Clarification; To resolve an ambiguity in the Mandate | |
---|---|
Tweet Topic Started: Jun 8 2015, 02:30 AM (402 Views) | |
Amerion | Jun 8 2015, 02:30 AM Post #1 |
Star Destroyer
|
If it may please the Court, I would like to request clarification of the Delegate's powers. Noted here, the Honourable Delegate Funkadelia has dismissed Minister of Foreign Affairs Church of Satan. The Delegate has expressed the following as a legal basis for doing so:
Article IV states:
As there is ambiguity as to whether it is within the Delegate's powers to dismiss his Ministers, I respectfully request that the Court interpret the Mandate to clarify this uncertainty. I thank you for your time. |
Replies: | |
---|---|
Belschaft | Jun 16 2015, 05:26 AM Post #11 |
Supreme Executive Chief Justice for Life
|
The Court, having considered the legal question presented before us by Amerion in regards to the ability of the Delegate to dismiss Ministers, has come to the following conclusion: Whilst Article Four, Clause Five of the Constitution unambiguously grants the Delegate the legal power to nominate Ministers for confirmation by the Legislature, it does not grant any direct power to the Delegate for the dismissal of these Ministers once so confirmed. Whilst it was clearly the intent of the framers of the Constitution that Ministers, as nominees of the Delegate, should serve at his pleasure, no plausible interpretation of the Constitution grants him this power. It is, however, the opinion of the Court that the Delegate does posses the power to nominate a replacement Minister for an incumbent, and as such, indirectly dismiss a Minister. We have identified the following as the procedure to be followed should a Minister refuse to resign their position at the request of the Delegate: The Delegate should nominate a replacement Minister to the Legislature, clearly indicating his desire that they replace the incumbent. Should the Legislature choose to confirm this new nomination, the incumbent should then be considered replaced and their term of office ended. The Court, as stated, remains firmly convinced that the intent of the framers was that the Delegate possess the direct power of dismissal, and considers it's omission an oversight. Whilst the indirect power of a replacement nomination exists, we recommend the Legislature amend the Constitution so as to grant the direct power. - Justice Belschaft - Justice Powthran - Justice RPI |
Amerion | Jun 16 2015, 07:12 AM Post #12 |
Star Destroyer
|
I would like to thank your Honours for this speedy judgement. |
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) |
« Previous Topic · Court Archive · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
Track Topic · E-mail Topic | 11:31 PM Jul 10 |
Theme by Sith - Recolored by Seth of Outline