Vote: Should an Alignment be Specified in the Constitution?

Welcome to the forums of the Undead Dominion of Lazarus. We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features

Pages:
1
2
3
4
5

Vote: Should an Alignment be Specified in the Constitution?
Tweet Topic Started: Apr 24 2015, 11:05 PM (704 Views)
Gulliver	Apr 24 2015, 11:05 PM Post #1
Lazarene Posts: 241 Group: Members Member #2 Joined: Apr 8, 2015	The question this time is whether we should specify our military alignment in the constitution. Vote for the options you approve of: Specify alignment as defender in constitution Specify alignment as either defender or neutral Don't specify alignment Prohibit being invader Other (please specify) Edited by Gulliver, Apr 27 2015, 11:16 AM.

Replies:
Ivo	Apr 25 2015, 02:19 AM Post #11
Lazarene Posts: 70 Group: Persona Non Grata Member #24 Joined: Apr 9, 2015 Alignment Lawful Good Military Stance Neutral	4 to Cormac.



Harmoneia	Apr 25 2015, 02:21 AM Post #12
Mhysa Posts: 657 Group: Accused Member #42 Joined: Apr 11, 2015 Alignment Lawful Good Military Stance Neutral Political Views Independent Nation in Lazarus Harmoneia	1 or 4 (prohibit invading)



The Church of Satan	Apr 25 2015, 08:51 AM Post #13
I HAVE CHORTLES! Posts: 861 Group: Accused Member #7 Joined: Apr 8, 2015 Alignment Lawful Good Military Stance Neutral Political Views Independent Nation in Lazarus Lazarus CoS	1.



Ryccia	Apr 25 2015, 02:19 PM Post #14
Lazarene Posts: 87 Group: Members Member #104 Joined: Apr 22, 2015	3



Loftegen	Apr 25 2015, 03:13 PM Post #15
Supreme Autocrat Posts: 11,070 Group: Members Member #108 Joined: Apr 23, 2015 Alignment Lawful Good Military Stance Neutral Political Views Independent	3. Defender status can be a policy of the sitting gov't, leaving the option of offensive operations available to future gov'ts - things change, after all, and sometimes the best defense is a good offence.



Myroria	Apr 25 2015, 07:57 PM Post #16
Revolutionary Posts: 186 Group: Vessel of Iniquity Member #4 Joined: Apr 8, 2015 Military Stance Uninterested Political Views Communist	4, agree with Cormac.



Powthran	Apr 25 2015, 09:07 PM Post #17
Lazarene Posts: 523 Group: Members Member #103 Joined: Apr 22, 2015 Alignment Lawful Neutral Military Stance Uninterested Political Views Conservative Nation in Lazarus Powthran	My vote is 3. To me, this is something the government should decide.



Harmoneia	Apr 25 2015, 09:19 PM Post #18
Mhysa Posts: 657 Group: Accused Member #42 Joined: Apr 11, 2015 Alignment Lawful Good Military Stance Neutral Political Views Independent Nation in Lazarus Harmoneia	The problem with letting the sitting govt decide is that it has the tendency to get flimsy and easily change per term. Which isn't a good factor to military stability and progress.



Tomb	Apr 26 2015, 03:53 AM Post #19
Lazarene Posts: 124 Group: Members Member #46 Joined: Apr 11, 2015 Alignment Lawful Good Military Stance Neutral Political Views Independent Nation in Lazarus Lazarus Tomb	3



Funkadelia	Apr 26 2015, 09:48 PM Post #20
Posts: 2,155 Group: King of the Undead Member #86 Joined: Apr 22, 2015 Alignment Chaotic Neutral Military Stance Raider Political Views Socialist Nation in Lazarus Funkadelia	Changing my vote to 4, with Cormac's idea.



1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Constitutional Convention 2015 · Next Topic »

Pages:
1
2
3
4
5