A Permanent ban

Welcome to the forums of the Undead Dominion of Lazarus. We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features

Pages:
1
2

A Permanent ban; An article for the Constitution
Tweet Topic Started: Apr 24 2015, 07:02 AM (325 Views)
Loftegen	Apr 24 2015, 07:02 AM Post #1
Supreme Autocrat Posts: 11,070 Group: Members Member #108 Joined: Apr 23, 2015 Alignment Lawful Good Military Stance Neutral Political Views Independent	I only know how I feel about this, which is to say: angry, bitter, and vindictive. Perhaps others have more moderate views, which is fine; especially since they may know the people I'm going to mention in Real Life, which is also fine. I'm not going to throw a fit if this doesn't make it into the final constitution, but I think it needs to be said. So, a proposed article: Article X: Banned Players The following nations, the Real Life people who created them, and all associated puppets are permanently banned from Lazarus: Feux, A mean old man, Milograd, Stujenske, Pergamon, and The Sweet Leaf. On the posting of a public apology in the Gameplay subforum of the NationStates forums, the Convocation of Souls may consider removing the aforesaid ban from the apologizing individual(s), such removal requiring a 2/3 majority vote. It's harsh, but I feel it is completely justified.

Replies:
Harmoneia	Apr 27 2015, 09:46 AM Post #11
Mhysa Posts: 657 Group: Accused Member #42 Joined: Apr 11, 2015 Alignment Lawful Good Military Stance Neutral Political Views Independent Nation in Lazarus Harmoneia	The Church of Satan Apr 27 2015, 03:19 AM Could just leave that to forum administration. I don't think we should be given that much power.



The Church of Satan	Apr 27 2015, 10:09 AM Post #12
I HAVE CHORTLES! Posts: 861 Group: Accused Member #7 Joined: Apr 8, 2015 Alignment Lawful Good Military Stance Neutral Political Views Independent Nation in Lazarus Lazarus CoS	I was under the impression forum side was implied. As for in-game, I would suggest a small group of trusted members of Lazarus, that discuss and vote on such matters.



Harmoneia	Apr 27 2015, 10:32 AM Post #13
Mhysa Posts: 657 Group: Accused Member #42 Joined: Apr 11, 2015 Alignment Lawful Good Military Stance Neutral Political Views Independent Nation in Lazarus Harmoneia	The Church of Satan Apr 27 2015, 10:09 AM I was under the impression forum side was implied. I think it is, but, it's still an in-game offense which I don't think warrants a forum ban by forum admins (who should be allowed to decide to ban only those people who harass other on a RL-level). Hence, allowing the forum admins to ban people for in-game offense kind of crosses the line IMO (which can be dangerous territory) and thus should be dealt with in character with due process, ideally by an open and governing body.



Campinia	Apr 27 2015, 10:41 AM Post #14
Lazarene Posts: 585 Group: Members Member #12 Joined: Apr 8, 2015	Agreed. Forum Administration bans should be reserved for the likes of Govindia and Tyler Kazakov.



1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · Constitutional Convention 2015 · Next Topic »

Pages:
1
2