Welcome Guest
[Log In]
[Register]
Welcome to the forums of the Undead Dominion of Lazarus. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
A Permanent ban; An article for the Constitution | |
---|---|
Tweet Topic Started: Apr 24 2015, 07:02 AM (324 Views) | |
Loftegen | Apr 24 2015, 07:02 AM Post #1 |
Supreme Autocrat
|
I only know how I feel about this, which is to say: angry, bitter, and vindictive. Perhaps others have more moderate views, which is fine; especially since they may know the people I'm going to mention in Real Life, which is also fine. I'm not going to throw a fit if this doesn't make it into the final constitution, but I think it needs to be said. So, a proposed article: Article X: Banned Players
It's harsh, but I feel it is completely justified. |
Gulliver | Apr 24 2015, 07:15 AM Post #2 |
Lazarene
|
I'd also be fine with a permanent ban, but does it have to be written into the Constitution? I'd hate for the governing document of what's supposed to be a thriving democracy to pay homage to their sort by name in any fashion. |
Arlo | Apr 24 2015, 08:56 AM Post #3 |
Lazarene
|
I think having it in the constitution places a bit of a sour note on the whole fresh start thing. Better to just have the new legislature (or whoever has the authority) pass such a ban immediately after it's created. |
Benevolent Thomas | Apr 24 2015, 04:30 PM Post #4 |
Blessed of the Vale
|
Yeah, nothing in the constitution. |
Dyr Nasad | Apr 24 2015, 06:14 PM Post #5 |
Lazarene
|
The perm ban makes sense, but I also dislike naming them in such an important document. Leave it to the new government to handle |
Harmoneia | Apr 24 2015, 06:35 PM Post #6 |
Mhysa
|
I concur, it would make perfect sense as an amendment later on though. :$ |
Cormac | Apr 24 2015, 07:31 PM Post #7 |
Lazarene
|
I've never been a huge fan of permanent bans. I'm not saying none of these people warrant one, but circumstances and feelings do tend to change over time in NationStates. I think it would be better to implement some kind of persona non grata power in statute. Maybe allow the assembly to declare a person PNG by majority vote and to repeal a PNG by majority vote. But I agree that this doesn't need to be in the constitution. |
Courlany | Apr 26 2015, 11:46 PM Post #8 |
Lazarene
|
I like his sensible idea that a permanent ban may be overturned with a two-thirds majority vote by users. That is right-headed thinking. Shows that we are above the B.S. |
Courlany | Apr 26 2015, 11:48 PM Post #9 |
Lazarene
|
Those users should be made into a museum piece. Do we have a Lazarene Museum of Culture? |
The Church of Satan | Apr 27 2015, 03:19 AM Post #10 |
I HAVE CHORTLES!
|
Could just leave that to forum administration. |
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) |
Go to Next Page | |
« Previous Topic · Constitutional Convention 2015 · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
Track Topic · E-mail Topic | 3:10 PM Jul 12 |
Theme by Sith - Recolored by Seth of Outline