Welcome Guest
[Log In]
[Register]
Welcome to the forums of the Undead Dominion of Lazarus. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features |
Should an alignment be specified in the Constitution? | |
---|---|
Tweet Topic Started: Apr 23 2015, 03:23 AM (697 Views) | |
Kazmr | Apr 23 2015, 03:23 AM Post #1 |
Lazarene
|
The PRL was explicitly and constitutionally a defender region. Non defenders could join, but typically could not serve in the LLA. Do we want this to be the case in the new Lazarus? I lean in favor of yes. I think we built a strong defender tradition under the PRL, and I think now is the time to build on it. The entire defender community came together to liberate Lazarus with unprecedented results, and it would be a shame to move away from those who perhaps could be said to have been our biggest supporters. |
Gulliver | Apr 23 2015, 03:27 AM Post #2 |
Lazarene
|
I'd be fine with specifying an alignment in statutory law, and would like it to remain Defender, but I don't think it should be in the Constitution. |
Funkadelia | Apr 23 2015, 04:01 AM Post #3 |
|
I agree with Gulliver. The army should be legislated as defender. |
Kazmr | Apr 23 2015, 04:03 AM Post #4 |
Lazarene
|
I think he is saying that, just that he would prefer it be passed by the legislature rather than in the constitution itself. |
Funkadelia | Apr 23 2015, 04:15 AM Post #5 |
|
Sorry, maybe I didn't make it clear that I support that also. |
Kazmr | Apr 23 2015, 04:26 AM Post #6 |
Lazarene
|
Totally misread... somehow thought it said disagreed |
Wintermoot | Apr 23 2015, 04:29 AM Post #7 |
Like Love At First Sight <3
|
The only difference is that if for some reason the region wanted to change alignments in the future I imagine it'd be easier to change statutory law than to amend the Constitution. I personally don't have a preference, but I just wanted to point that out. |
Benevolent Thomas | Apr 23 2015, 05:29 AM Post #8 |
Blessed of the Vale
|
If there's a way to make an alignment change only possible via a super-majority in the legislature, I'd be okay with it being defined in statutory law. I don't want our alignment to change nilly-willy with each passing craze/fad. |
Funkadelia | Apr 23 2015, 05:33 AM Post #9 |
|
I can see that side of the argument... |
Benevolent Thomas | Apr 23 2015, 05:38 AM Post #10 |
Blessed of the Vale
|
If we leave the door open to "independence" as an alignment... I just can't even. Defender, Neutral (as in no GP), or invader please. |
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) |
Go to Next Page | |
« Previous Topic · Constitutional Convention 2015 · Next Topic » |
Track Topic · E-mail Topic | 3:08 PM Jul 12 |
Theme by Sith - Recolored by Seth of Outline