Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]



Welcome to the forums of the Undead Dominion of Lazarus. We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features

Username:   Password:
Image hosting by Photobucket
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
Amendment to the Mandate (Endo Counts)
Topic Started: Jul 21 2017, 08:03 PM (246 Views)
Aumelodia
Member Avatar
🌺 His Divine Eminence
Quote:
 
(4) All worlds or nations shall be permitted to maintain the following endorsements counts:
A. 80 WA endorsement count for residents.
B. 100 WA endorsement count for nations endorsing the Sovereign.
C. 20 WA endorsements or more below Defender of the Realm for citizens by forum application or extended residency.
D. Guardians shall hold an endorsement count between the Defender of the Realm's and half that of the Sovereign's.

Currently Guardians, having no specified endorsement count requirement elsewhere, may only maintain the same number of endorsements as regular citizens; namely, 20 below the DoTR. They also could legally have, say, 5 endorsements, which of course would do no good in a security position. :P This would allow them to maintain any number of endorsements up to (but not above) the DoTR's, and a minimum of half the Sovereign's, which is in fact the requirement to apply for Guardian.
Mini Profile Top
 
Replies:
Lazarene Lenlyvit
Member Avatar
Lazarene
Wintermoot
Jul 21 2017, 09:18 PM
Aumelodia
Jul 21 2017, 09:08 PM
Currently, you are the only Guardian who has a legal endo count. If the DoTR isn't tarting, then why are they even DoTR in the first place?

How about this:
Quote:
 
D. Guardians shall hold an endorsement count between the Defender of the Realm's and half that of the Sovereign's, except during a period of transition of the Defender of the Realm, during which they may maintain any endorsement count above half of the Sovereign's.
That's a valid question, but we can't assume voters will demand the DotR to be active and tarting...they haven't necessarily done so in the past. What about an alternative limit in the event that the DotR has so many fewer endorsements than the Sovereign?
Is 1/2+20 of the amount of the Sovereigns endorsement too high?
Mini Profile Top
 
Constie
Member Avatar
Chief Justice Emeritus of the Grand Court
I mean, it doesn't look like Doper is tarting very hard, he's lagged behind the Guardians this entire term, I believe. I don't see a problem with the law right now. It only doesn't work if you have a Realm Defender who doesn't tart.
Mini Profile Top
 
The13th
Member Avatar
Guy in the Public Eye
I'm in support of these amendments. It's the DotR's job to tart. :)
Mini Profile Top
 
Amerion
Member Avatar
Star Destroyer
Full support
Mini Profile Top
 
Mekhet
Member Avatar
Lazarene
You can't have hard numbers like that, not without subtracting from the Delegate. For instance, must be 50 endorsements below Delegate or whatever for each role and situations.
Mini Profile Top
 
Drall
Member Avatar
Wildly Popular Scoundrel
If the DotR isn't tarting, they quite simply shouldn't hold that office. :p
Edited by Drall, Jul 22 2017, 04:35 AM.
Mini Profile Top
 
Cokeland Saxton
No Avatar
Lazarene
I support this.
Mini Profile Top
 
killer kitty
Member Avatar
THIS COLOR ANNOYS LAMB
This seems like a good way to have the Guardians be horribly behind the Delegate if they ever coup. Hope the Defender of the Realm has a high endo count and isn't in on the plot?
Mini Profile Top
 
Drall
Member Avatar
Wildly Popular Scoundrel
Saw Mek raised a good point earlier - any sane legislation in regards to endocounts will use percentages of the sovereign's count instead of hard numbers, allowing for flexibility in numbers, a somewhat obvious change. Using plain, hard set numbers is simply ridiculous, and can be quite disastrous.

KK also raises a very valid point. In the event of the Delegate enacting a coup, the Guardians could, and judging by the endocounts of the last few months, probably would be left quite far behind the Delegate. Again, this would be disastrous for the obvious reasons. Probably something best fixed by enforcing a policy where the Guardians have to have a higher endorsement level, or be subject to recall from their office.
Mini Profile Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Create a free forum in seconds.
« Previous Topic · Cosmic Council Archive · Next Topic »
Image hosting by Photobucket
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2


Theme by Sith - Recolored by Seth of Outline