Welcome Guest
[Log In]
[Register]
Welcome to the forums of the Undead Dominion of Lazarus. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features |
[PROPOSAL] Amendment to the Mandate; Re: Powers of the Celestial Being | |
---|---|
Tweet Topic Started: Jul 17 2017, 11:14 PM (599 Views) | |
Funkadelia | Jul 17 2017, 11:14 PM Post #1 |
|
My proposed amendments are as follows:
These amendments are a simple clarification of what most of us already knew to be true: that the Celestial Being is legally bound to obey the votes of the citizens in all elections, confirmations, etc. While I still maintain that this is the case regardless of the status of the above clauses, it would be better to remove them to clarify that the voice of the people is supreme. When we were establishing this mandate, a major concern that several of us had was limiting the power of the Celestial Being. We were assured by the authors that the CB would be almost exclusively a Roleplay based position, and I specifically asked whether the votes of the citizens would be able to be trumped by the Celestial Being, and I was told that that would not be the case. The best course of action is to amend the Mandate to fulfill that spirit, especially where the "discretion" clauses also directly contradict the far more forceful language used to tie the assent of the Celestial Being to electoral/voting results. |
Omega | Jul 17 2017, 11:20 PM Post #2 |
Star Lord
|
I believe those clauses provide a way for the Celestial Being to ensure the integrity of the government is not compromised by a potentially compromised vote. I'm opposed. |
Ark | Jul 17 2017, 11:22 PM Post #3 |
Lazarene
|
Proposing this at the same time as Aumelodia refuses to assent to your nomination of an LWUer as prelate... yeah, I'm not buying into this. 👎 |
The Church of Satan | Jul 17 2017, 11:22 PM Post #4 |
I HAVE CHORTLES!
|
I too am adamantly opposed to this miscarriage of justice and I will fight this corruption with all my might. |
The13th | Jul 17 2017, 11:26 PM Post #5 |
Guy in the Public Eye
|
I am against this proposal- sorry Funkadelia. We need a system of checks and balances. I want the peoples voice to be supreme, but it just seems fine the way it is. "One change always leaves the way open for the establishment of others." Lol for all of you coup conspiracy people. Edited by The13th, Jul 17 2017, 11:27 PM.
|
Funkadelia | Jul 17 2017, 11:28 PM Post #6 |
|
I would disagree that it's fine. Because of this debacle, and the refusal of some to accept our election results, we are at an unsolvable impasse. There is no clear resolution to this unless one of two things happen: People realize that it is contradictory to the law to refuse to assent to a candidate confirmed by the citizens, or we make an amendment to clear up that dispute altogether. If we do neither, we are at a constitutional crisis that cannot be solved because the courts will remain vacant forever. |
Svez | Jul 17 2017, 11:40 PM Post #7 |
That One Guy Who Does Stuff
|
I'm not sure what I've missed while I was studying for the police academy exam, but removing the power of the Celestial Being's only position makes it a glorified "citizen of the season" position, which I'm against. Before you know it, convenor will be the manager of deputies, prelates will just review the history of legal things and only the council can determine legality of anything, people in charge of the LCA just push papers and write reports while the LCA itself runs under another department, and etc etc. Removing the power of one department is the dangerous domino effect that works against the democracy Lazarus stands for. And yes, while "at discretion" isn't democratic, it is how Lazarus functions, with an emergency power use. This position is essential, as it is, in the working of Lazarene governance. To strip that power of the Celestial Being is to consolidate power elsewhere, and such a legal means of creating another power dynamic in a grand democracy that i know and love is an abhorrent attack I myself will not support. The Celestial Being has its power because of what it does when it does it. |
Lamb | Jul 17 2017, 11:48 PM Post #8 |
|
So what you're all proposing is that it is better for one individual to be capable of contradicting the votes of the entire Council, than it is to allow our legislature vote, enact, and appoint as it is entitled to? It sounds like you're all in favor of a dictatorship instead of a democracy. The CB's purpose is not to personally object in areas against the legislature. If you would like to consolidate this authority into one individual, that really says a lot about your perspective regarding what our government is supposed to be. This is clearly being proposed now because this is a time when this was made apparent. If the assent and blessing had been endorsed as a complete necessity and something that the CB could legally use to go against a vote, then this change would have been proposed long ago. I won't even go into the fact that we all have absolutely considered the Celestial Being as a position of formality and roleplay for the most part for the entirety of the time that this Mandate has existed. Most of your replies aren't surprising, given the constant disagreements and feuds that have been going on lately, but you should really take a step back and look at what you're saying. Edited by Lamb, Jul 17 2017, 11:50 PM.
|
Wintermoot | Jul 18 2017, 12:00 AM Post #9 |
Like Love At First Sight <3
|
The purpose of the Cosmic Council is the represent the will of the people. The idea that the vote which the Celestial Being is objecting to represented the will of the people is laughable at best...a vote won by an effort to import people to vote for him, which was likely condoned if not outright conducted by the highest levels of this government. I agree that if proposed long ago this would have passed without controversy, but I also think that long ago nobody would have foreseen recent events or the need for the Celestial Being to assent to the integrity of a successful election. I can't vote for this at this time, because I think it's being proposed not to improve the integrity of our elections, but to further the political agenda of a particular group. Edited by Wintermoot, Jul 18 2017, 12:02 AM.
|
Harmoneia | Jul 18 2017, 02:18 AM Post #10 |
Mhysa
|
And a democracy passes a law ex post facto? |
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) |
Go to Next Page | |
« Previous Topic · Cosmic Council Archive · Next Topic » |
Track Topic · E-mail Topic | 1:12 PM Jul 11 |
Theme by Sith - Recolored by Seth of Outline