Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]



Welcome to the forums of the Undead Dominion of Lazarus. We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features

Username:   Password:
Image hosting by Photobucket
[Proposal] Amendment to the Mandate; Regarding a Core World holding multiple offices at any given time
Topic Started: Jun 25 2017, 07:20 AM (94 Views)
Amerion
Member Avatar
Star Destroyer
SS.6 of Article V (Miscellaneous Provisions) of the Celestial Mandate Act states:

Quote:
 
Holding of Offices

(6) No Core World in the office of the Celestial Being, the Sovereign, the Defender of the Realm, an Archbishop, a Bishop, the Convenor, a Deputy to the Convenor, the Holy Prelate, or a Prelate, may at any one time, occupy his own office and that of another.

I note the mention of Bishop and Deputy to the Convenor. As these offices are typically construed as being secondary in nature, I propose we strike the mention of them from this sub-section; thereby freeing up persons currently in these positions from serving Lazarus in another capacity as well.

I submit the following amendment:




The Celestial Union of Lazarus
Amendment to the Celestial Mandate Act
No. 19 of 2017
The Cosmic Council enacts:

PART 1 — PRELIMINARY
1 Purposes
The purposes of this Act are –
  • To refine the list of offices a Counciller may serve simultaneously.

2 Commencement
This Act comes into operation upon passage.

PART 2 — TEXT
1 - Amendment to Section 6, Article V, of the Act

The following section:

(6) No Core World in the office of the Celestial Being, the Sovereign, the Defender of the Realm, an Archbishop, a Bishop, the Convenor, a Deputy to the Convenor, the Holy Prelate, or a Prelate, may at any one time, occupy his own office and that of another.

Shall be amended to:

(6) No Core World in the office of the Celestial Being, the Sovereign, the Defender of the Realm, an Archbishop, the Convenor, the Holy Prelate, or a Prelate, may at any one time, occupy his own office and that of another.




Mini Profile Top
 
Funkadelia
Member Avatar

I oppose this proposal, especially on the grounds that this is still an issue of the separation of powers. Bishops are members of the executive branch, and deputy convenors are members of the legislative. Once you remove that wall of separation, what makes that any different than an Archbishop also being the Convenor?
Mini Profile Top
 
Amerion
Member Avatar
Star Destroyer
I think there are some members in our community who could very well work as both DoC and Bishops as these aren't particular tedious tasks (compared to the Convenor and their respective Archbishops).

While I agree with you that a Separation of Powers should exist, I am unsure to what extent we should mandate it in Lazarus. Not to dwell on other matters, but I'd argue that if we were to have full SoP then the executive should not have a say on legislative procedures.
Mini Profile Top
 
Lamb
Member Avatar

I would say that, especially with all that needs to be done in this region, to imply that a Bishop's work could be insignificant or not very demanding is an understatement.

The same can be said with the Deputies of the Convenor, considering how much legislation, discussion, and need for leadership that the Council has needed just this last month alone.
Mini Profile Top
 
Amerion
Member Avatar
Star Destroyer
Lamb
Jun 25 2017, 07:41 AM
I would say that, especially with all that needs to be done in this region, to imply that a Bishop's work could be insignificant or not very demanding is an understatement.

The same can be said with the Deputies of the Convenor, considering how much legislation, discussion, and need for leadership that the Council has needed just this last month alone.
Having been out of the executive for quite some time, I'll defer to your experience as Archbishop on this.
Mini Profile Top
 
Funkadelia
Member Avatar

Amerion
Jun 25 2017, 07:38 AM
I think there are some members in our community who could very well work as both DoC and Bishops as these aren't particular tedious tasks (compared to the Convenor and their respective Archbishops).

While I agree with you that a Separation of Powers should exist, I am unsure to what extent we should mandate it in Lazarus. Not to dwell on other matters, but I'd argue that if we were to have full SoP then the executive should not have a say on legislative procedures.
I know that this is a direct reference to the shortening of the voting period, which, as I laid out previously, is a region-wide decision for emergency circumstances, such as an imploded court, a coup, or a war, and a 3-step procedure involving heads of the region, much like a nuclear launch decision might be, is what is appropriate for that case. However, in terms of the mingling of convenors and bishops, that is a separate issue and is irrelevant to anything else outside of this discussion.
Edited by Funkadelia, Jun 25 2017, 07:55 AM.
Mini Profile Top
 
The13th
Member Avatar
Guy in the Public Eye
I think that we need to keep the Executive and Legislative clearly separated, with some slight overlap to provide checks and balances. Nevertheless, I think we could define lesser offices, such as being an Ambassador, to clear up the written statement that a government official from a superior office can still hold a lesser office, but not another superior office. I don't know if you can understand what I'm saying there! :) I typed it up quickly
Mini Profile Top
 
Constie
Member Avatar
Chief Justice Emeritus of the Grand Court
Funkadelia
Jun 25 2017, 07:49 AM
Amerion
Jun 25 2017, 07:38 AM
I think there are some members in our community who could very well work as both DoC and Bishops as these aren't particular tedious tasks (compared to the Convenor and their respective Archbishops).

While I agree with you that a Separation of Powers should exist, I am unsure to what extent we should mandate it in Lazarus. Not to dwell on other matters, but I'd argue that if we were to have full SoP then the executive should not have a say on legislative procedures.
I know that this is a direct reference to the shortening of the voting period, which, as I laid out previously, is a region-wide decision for emergency circumstances, such as an imploded court, a coup, or a war, and a 3-step procedure involving heads of the region, much like a nuclear launch decision might be, is what is appropriate for that case. However, in terms of the mingling of convenors and bishops, that is a separate issue and is irrelevant to anything else outside of this discussion.
In the event of a coup, or a war, an Emergency Powers Act should be created.
Mini Profile Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Cosmic Council Archive · Next Topic »
Image hosting by Photobucket


Theme by Sith - Recolored by Seth of Outline