| Welcome to the forums of the Humane Republic of Lazarus. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features |
| Review of The Citizen's Oath Act; Request for Review | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Yesterday, 4:16 AM (19 Views) | |
| The Church of Satan | Yesterday, 4:16 AM Post #1 |
|
I HAVE CHORTLES!
|
THE GRAND COURT OF THE MAGICAL REALMS OF LAZARUS Presiding Grand Judge The Church of Satan Judge Loftegen Judge Frankender Petitioner: Amerion October 17, 2016 As written by The Church of Satan On submission as a Request for Review Legal Question: Enforceability of The Citizen's Oath Act; If an official clearly demonstrates disloyalty to Lazarus and/or breaks a law, are these grounds for dismissal? The Petitioner's Submission: The petitioner who submitted this request asks whether or not breaking The Citizen's Oath Act warrants removal from elected & confirmed positions.
Ruling This court acknowledges that the term "disloyalty" could be dangerously broad, detrimentally so. However any holder of a position that requires election or confirmation that takes the oath and breaks it, willingly or not, must indeed be removed from their position if found guilty for anything listed in the Unified Criminal Code as a crime, specifically under The Criminal Code. This court has decided so due to the fact that most crimes listed in the Unified Criminal Code involve a certain amount of deception which could be construed as an act of disloyalty. Additionally, most offences listed under Article 2 of The Criminal Code are serious enough to warrant removal from public office. |
|
|
| 0 users reading this topic | |
| « Previous Topic · Rulings · Next Topic » |